Re: [Asrg] CRI Header

Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com> Sun, 08 June 2003 17:36 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA26151 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:36:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h58Ha8712421 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:36:08 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h58Ha3B12414 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:36:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA26137; Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:35:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19P43D-0004VT-00; Sun, 08 Jun 2003 13:33:51 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19P43C-0004VQ-00; Sun, 08 Jun 2003 13:33:50 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h58HWOB12353; Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:32:24 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h58HV2B12324 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:31:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA26042 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:30:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19P3yI-0004Tk-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2003 13:28:46 -0400
Received: from 000-243-873.area7.spcsdns.net ([68.27.192.34] helo=68.27.192.34 ident=trilluser) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19P3yE-0004Th-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2003 13:28:43 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030608133017.00b9b110@solidmatrix.com>
X-Sender: research@solidmatrix.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
From: Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] CRI Header
Cc: "asrg@ietf.org" <asrg@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-MimeHeaders-Plugin-Info: v2.03.00
X-GCMulti: 1
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 13:30:18 -0400

At 10:19 PM 6/5/2003 -0400, Tony Hansen wrote:

>Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
>>The question is what do we do during the standards process until the RFC 
>>is approved, do we use "X-" or the regular headers?
>
>Simple: you write the internet draft in terms of what you expect to be 
>standardized. That is, in terms of regular headers.
>
>For example, when the MIME standard was being worked on, the internet 
>drafts were written using headers such as Content-Type, etc. They were NOT 
>written using X-Content-Type, and the name changed right before 
>publication. It was specified as Content-Type all along.

Tony,

Thanks for pointing this out.

Yakov  

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg