Re: [Asrg] What are the IPs that sends mail for a domain?

Bill Cole <asrg3@billmail.scconsult.com> Mon, 29 June 2009 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <asrg3@billmail.scconsult.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930B63A6B91 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.742
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M7mY4pnsNti9 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from toaster.scconsult.com (www.scconsult.com [66.73.230.185]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EE83A6B73 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bigsky.scconsult.com (bigsky.scconsult.com [192.168.2.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by toaster.scconsult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5998E0857 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:35:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4A48ED68.8010901@billmail.scconsult.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:35:52 -0400
From: Bill Cole <asrg3@billmail.scconsult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090408 Eudora/3.0b2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <20090616225543.11524.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <628BBDFC-0DDE-47B6-BC41-EAF846EE9D5D@mail-abuse.org>
In-Reply-To: <628BBDFC-0DDE-47B6-BC41-EAF846EE9D5D@mail-abuse.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] What are the IPs that sends mail for a domain?
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: asrg@irtf.org
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:35:36 -0000

Douglas Otis wrote, On 6/16/09 8:24 PM:
>
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 3:55 PM, John Levine wrote:

[...]

>> We've had a variety of proposals to identify mail client hosts. See
>> http://mipassoc.org/csv/
>
> The CSV effort proved most providers do not want their MTAs identified
> as belonging to them, even when it could improve email acceptance.

Not really. As far as I can tell, provider attention was not controlled for 
in that experiment.

In my experience the awareness of existing Internet standards, the Internet 
standards process, and the "open unstructured testing in production" model 
that dominates the development of new protocol features among people running 
mail systems and companies selling mail services is very low. I would be 
shocked if most providers of mail services even today are aware of the CSV 
proposals' existence at any level, either corporately or among their 
technical staff.

> This
> might be especially true now after their support staff has been reduced.

Obviously that plays strongly into the awareness issue.