Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs

Paul Russell <prussell@nd.edu> Thu, 17 December 2009 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <prussell@nd.edu>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA793A69D3 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:55:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.236
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.207, BAYES_40=-0.185, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjhklTnIR9m8 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-p1.cc.nd.edu (mx-p1.cc.nd.edu [129.74.250.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D724F3A69C1 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:55:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta-2.cc.nd.edu (mta-2.cc.nd.edu [129.74.250.37]) by mx-p1.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.3.0/Switch-3.3.0) with ESMTP id nBHIsZ1J010376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:54:36 -0500
Received: from [172.19.226.14] (nat20.cc.nd.edu [129.74.4.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mta-2.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.3.0/Switch-3.3.0) with ESMTP id nBHIt9ae027645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:55:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B2A7E8D.8060104@nd.edu>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:55:09 -0500
From: Paul Russell <prussell@nd.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912082138050.20682@simone.lan> <20091216014800.GA29103@gsp.org> <DBF77720-200E-4846-949F-924388F9CC15@blighty.com> <20091216120742.GA28622@gsp.org> <20091216185904.3B9032421D@panix5.panix.com> <4B296458.5070603@mail-abuse.org> <16C1C8A4-D223-435B-93BC-A9D44F5965A1@guppylake.com> <B14EC7430355853625D0D4EA@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk> <BBF2AC03-3C88-4557-9346-343347C196A9@guppylake.com> <240DB04672256506ED548857@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <240DB04672256506ED548857@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: 129.74.250.37
X-ND-MTA-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:54:36 EST
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:55:26 -0000

On 12/17/2009 13:04, Ian Eiloart wrote:
> Anyway, the worst case scenario is that users hit one of the two buttons at 
> random. In that situation, you simply treat the buttons as equivalent, and 
> take the same action for each.
> 

If you're going to do that, why do you need two buttons?

-- 
Paul Russell, Senior Systems Administrator
OIT Messaging Services Team
University of Notre Dame