Re: [Asrg] We don't need no stinkin IMAP or POP, was Adding a spam button to MUAs

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sun, 07 February 2010 06:42 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356163A6B82 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:42:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.641
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3hB6xIQE7gBH for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:42:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (mail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D2A3A6DCC for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:42:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mach-4.tana.it (mach-4.tana.it [194.243.254.189]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 515, TLS: TLS1.0,256bits,RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:43:52 +0100 id 00000000005DC033.000000004B6E6128.00000E8E
Message-ID: <4B6E620E.1080000@tana.it>
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:47:42 +0100
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <20100206143422.26746.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <4B6DA714.3040402@nortel.com> <DF65B46F-2502-4F85-9AE3-C08220397C58@blighty.com>
In-Reply-To: <DF65B46F-2502-4F85-9AE3-C08220397C58@blighty.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] We don't need no stinkin IMAP or POP, was Adding a spam button to MUAs
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:42:57 -0000

Steve Atkins wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Chris Lewis wrote:
>> In-stream configuration (via MDA or MTA) would work, but it requires the MDA/MTA be modified.  Which we're avoiding.
>
> It requires the ability to add a header, for basic usage a constant header. That's a trivial configuration change, nothing more.

If we're talking minimal changes, the other header-based approach, 
overloading the existing Autherntication-Results, requires no 
MDA/MTA modifications.