[Asrg] HTTP responses (was: About that summary of MUA junk button approaches
Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Mon, 15 February 2010 06:53 UTC
Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231B43A7AB1 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:53:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjZYfyQjGCUE for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:53:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (www.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F20A3A7AAC for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:53:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 515, TLS: TLS1.0,256bits,RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:55:14 +0100 id 00000000005DC033.000000004B78EFD2.000027CD
Message-ID: <4B78EFD2.5030008@tana.it>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:55:14 +0100
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002142114380.24089@simone.lan> <F997FD09-8335-47E1-9BCB-EDF653C440F2@blighty.com>
In-Reply-To: <F997FD09-8335-47E1-9BCB-EDF653C440F2@blighty.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Asrg] HTTP responses (was: About that summary of MUA junk button approaches
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:53:47 -0000
On 15/Feb/10 03:30, Steve Atkins wrote: > > I saw several things I'd like to update (HTTP vs store-and-forward,[...] I only mentioned that the web server might have different userid and password. This hasn't really been discussed, but one source of HTTP difficulty for MUAs stems from HTML responses, as they should pop up a browser window. E.g. the web server may require a CAPTCHA. OTOH, the protocol might specify SOAP or JSON approaches, where interactivity is not required nor wanted.
- [Asrg] About that summary of MUA junk button appr… John R. Levine
- Re: [Asrg] About that summary of MUA junk button … Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] About that summary of MUA junk button … Chris Lewis
- [Asrg] HTTP responses (was: About that summary of… Alessandro Vesely