[Asrg] Need to know

Scott Nelson <scott@spamwolf.com> Sat, 24 May 2003 20:02 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA04184 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 24 May 2003 16:02:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4OK21U27942 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 24 May 2003 16:02:01 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4OK20B27937 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Sat, 24 May 2003 16:02:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA04177; Sat, 24 May 2003 16:01:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JfBl-0001qp-00; Sat, 24 May 2003 16:00:21 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JfBl-0001qm-00; Sat, 24 May 2003 16:00:21 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4OK0UB27865; Sat, 24 May 2003 16:00:30 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4OJx0B27785 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Sat, 24 May 2003 15:59:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA04110 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 May 2003 15:58:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Jf8r-0001q2-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sat, 24 May 2003 15:57:21 -0400
Received: from adsl-66-120-64-133.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([66.120.64.133] helo=magic1.org) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Jf8r-0001pz-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sat, 24 May 2003 15:57:21 -0400
Message-Id: <aT5vaIe86J8qbrFtW02@x>
To: asrg@ietf.org
From: Scott Nelson <scott@spamwolf.com>
Subject: [Asrg] Need to know
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 12:58:52 -0700

Something Jon Kyme said brought a question to my mind; "How much 
would spam be reduced by limiting the number of recipients to one?"
also a related question "What are the effects of limiting the number 
of recipients to one for non spam email?"
I don't think anyone really knows, 
though doubtless many here could posit very good theories.

This begs the question, 
"What would we need to know, in order to answer those questions?"


Scott Nelson <scott@spamwolf.com>
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg