Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 20 September 2012 05:07 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE0021F8666 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, J_CHICKENPOX_29=0.6, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVoprISU4Wt5 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCE821F862B for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 95709 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2012 05:07:20 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 20 Sep 2012 05:07:20 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=505aa488.xn--30v786c.k1208; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=IUh6lu6Bb3XGyN3Pd1rTrYF1az3pRkznDtKdFZoG3WY=; b=N5J8BYdVaRPLtJb+liUbzEx5+7S2K+x2JuusCc3HiUJ0bx39YytJ7hXLXow32Z4BlnoGZ/wlCNlcH25cm/DEu0wipSXZ33Rvqu31DuMLTqqEkNshiog9HGq/Eb8kGyJSruPM3e9fi3u9XkhI8G1DqtH8m86uGw2e8tAH+B83SK8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=505aa488.xn--30v786c.k1208; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=IUh6lu6Bb3XGyN3Pd1rTrYF1az3pRkznDtKdFZoG3WY=; b=qFtIjNw7MglbwEPnoq7lVGFIjmkAaeKqVToPJIwZ3FaAzNloWdjPtPQfBmZX81GnWFH//CAAKvO8K/jAknbMAXCa69F7jfGfdF2FE3Xwo9JXtLQ3/InO9eQwiehpAqY5v7VA860rHcQ1+aIijlQqSu+QPcxypuWfCAii3ihj+Bk=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: 20 Sep 2012 05:06:58 -0000
Message-ID: <20120920050658.89937.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: asrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <505A6BFA.5020504@mustelids.ca>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:07:25 -0000

In article <505A6BFA.5020504@mustelids.ca> you write:
>On 12-09-19 05:33 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
>> As I've mentioned a few time, I'm trying to figure out the cache
>> behavior of DNSBLs, so we can try and predict whether IPv6 BLs would
>> make the DNS melt down.
>
>Didn't you already do this with data from my logs a year or more ago?

No, that was something else.

>I don't have large production flow anymore but will IP:timestamp from a
>trap do? I have several at the million-ish/day level ;-)

It's certainly better than nothing.  A real mail server would probably have
large chunks of traffic from big mail hosts that a trap doesn't, but I'll
take what I can get.

By the way, anyone else interested in modelling and simulation?  It's fun.

R's,
John