[Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative

Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com> Fri, 23 May 2003 19:35 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA22325 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:35:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4NJYk623807 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:34:46 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4NJYkB23804 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:34:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA22297; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:34:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JII1-0001ag-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:33:17 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JII0-0001ad-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:33:16 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4NJS6B23509; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:28:06 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4NJRSB23488 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:27:28 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA22151 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:27:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JIAy-0001YL-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:26:00 -0400
Received: from 000-238-702.area5.spcsdns.net ([68.27.171.197] helo=68.27.171.197) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JIAw-0001YD-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 15:25:59 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030523152407.00bb27f0@pop.pocketmail.com>
X-Sender: research@solidmatrix.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
To: asrg@ietf.org
From: Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-MimeHeaders-Plugin-Info: v2.03.00
X-GCMulti: 1
Subject: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 15:27:07 -0400

Below is a CNET News.com article about a new anti-spam proposal in the House:

http://news.com.com/2100-1025-1009467.html

Some highlights:
-------------snip----------------
* Nobody may send "any commercial electronic mail message" unless it 
permits the recipient to unsubscribe, includes a valid return e-mail 
address and street address, and makes it obvious that the e-mail is an 
advertisement or solicitation. There is no requirement for an "ADV:" notice 
in the subject line, which other proposals would mandate. If the recipient 
chooses to unsubscribe, the person sending the e-mail may not make contact 
again until a three-year period has elapsed.

* An Internet service provider (ISP) could sue for damages of $10 for each 
e-mail sent to someone who "opted out," up to a maximum of $500,000. 
Lawsuits must be brought in federal court, and if a judge decides that the 
accused spammer "knowingly" violated the law, total damages would triple to 
$1.5 million.

* False or misleading header information would be banned. State attorneys 
general could sue violators and seek damages of up to $3 million. The FTC 
and the U.S. Justice Department also would have jurisdiction. They would 
receive the additional power to sue people who don't include the necessary 
identification information in commercial e-mail.

* Inclusion of "sexually oriented material" in any commercial e-mail 
message would become a federal crime, unless the sender follows regulations 
to be devised by the FTC. Violators of the rule would be punished by up to 
two years in a federal prison. It would also become a federal crime to send 
any commercial e-mail that "falsifies the sender's identity"

* If an ISP were harmed by those two types of messages--unlawful sex e-mail 
or those with false identification--it could sue for damages of $500 for 
each e-mail.

* It would become unlawful to send commercial e-mail to an address that was 
obtained from an automated scan of a Web site.

* No class-action lawsuits on behalf of spam recipients would be allowed.
-------------snip----------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yakov Shafranovich / <research@solidmatrix.com>
SolidMatrix Research, a division of SolidMatrix Technologies, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"One who watches the wind will never sow, and one who keeps his eyes on
the clouds will never reap" (Ecclesiastes 11:4)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg