Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again
Chris Lewis <clewis+ietf@mustelids.ca> Thu, 20 September 2012 01:06 UTC
Return-Path: <clewis+ietf@mustelids.ca>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B40C921F849D for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.152
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=2.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001,
FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, J_CHICKENPOX_29=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yAbeMYwWdP8J for
<asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.mustelids.ca (unknown [174.35.130.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id E915821F849C for <asrg@irtf.org>;
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.8] (otter.mustelids.ca [192.168.0.8]) (authenticated
bits=0) by mail.mustelids.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2ubuntu2) with ESMTP id
q8K162kD031203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256
verify=NOT) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:06:03 -0400
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail.mustelids.ca q8K162kD031203
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mustelids.ca;
s=default.private; t=1348103163;
bh=LXG8hHPRefmanUGEo3LTv6EQ1vCbmJuRkz3IEzXcC5o=;
h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=XCul7n5Xgr8fmYDaSjg6I3vfM7XpddzfcGtuJv3affUOEX+u3S2DMUcbzTTME5p5W
ymZ60Su22tK+1f9U3OhVB11wPfkMiNC8iBBykDttCPfK9EmZFUfY4PO5V8sPu658A+
/qhbj0dmlS+9KcOJR86mTFqRlAp0T5TdWnXGe5So=
Message-ID: <505A6BFA.5020504@mustelids.ca>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:06:02 -0400
From: Chris Lewis <clewis+ietf@mustelids.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB;
rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209191729210.75412@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209191729210.75412@joyce.lan>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:06:09 -0000
On 12-09-19 05:33 PM, John R. Levine wrote: > As I've mentioned a few time, I'm trying to figure out the cache > behavior of DNSBLs, so we can try and predict whether IPv6 BLs would > make the DNS melt down. Didn't you already do this with data from my logs a year or more ago? I don't have large production flow anymore but will IP:timestamp from a trap do? I have several at the million-ish/day level ;-)
- [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again John R. Levine
- Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again Matthias Leisi
- Re: [Asrg] DNSBL caches and IPv6, again John Levine