Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 25 January 2012 18:39 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id A0F9B21F85E4 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:39:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.623
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-102.623 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fbErHtDAZY-D for
<asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:39:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com
[IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
22AB221F85D5 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:39:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1])
(authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
q0PIcnBE013972 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:38:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010;
t=1327516734; i=@resistor.net; bh=0foDof4qR6uG0wAp2j9+640o9ccRRTfLOIlLHWVlfFI=;
h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc;
b=MIq55/3+EBrp1OhsEo6dwI7VrI9CYDBLYuK3TSldnpZ+vF9xYKdoDmmqtMDyLTFPd
E5FQ5SG+7w5k/PM+24o7Z1owFmxU2H/EIv7pZOUgROcVD9v+Cyz7Wqc8bwwa33eKpB
y5qSD0jB+58M1bpCIu0DAZ0Va+DvX8KtM/4D7lJg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail;
t=1327516734; i=@resistor.net; bh=0foDof4qR6uG0wAp2j9+640o9ccRRTfLOIlLHWVlfFI=;
h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc;
b=XPJlNqJPx0gd2sQYKO6YEoFHoQaiPe8NsLc+t6d4AoVRISNj7lkjPErCr1HTjulC0
3qduoX+WCTqWEFE6o/uETr7RiyvaFSYKlKFWdn/NsnXHRv4efIw+Vj5mCVJTRP3BQq
IkortlEiNLBA4bz9v6qG+k4UPfAfvPIA98YJUl4s=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120125102806.0ae6afe8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:37:52 -0800
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <18B53BA2A483AD45962AAD1397BE13253846E0FE87@UK-EXCHMBX1.gre
en.sophos>
References: <18B53BA2A483AD45962AAD1397BE13253846E0FE87@UK-EXCHMBX1.green.sophos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:39:04 -0000
At 07:07 24-01-2012, Martijn Grooten wrote: >(Vamsoft ORF is a spam-filter.) Basically uribl.com was returning >127.0.0.1 to _all_ queries from nameservers that are sending high >volumes (presumably without paying for it) as some kind of >punishment. http://uribl.com/ confirms that. "After investigating this further, it seems the affected ORF users all use Google public DNS servers for the queries (or use such servers as forwarders in their local DNS configuration)." Anyone using open recursive DNS servers or their ISP's DNS server for DNSBL queries is asking for trouble. The listing is to get the attention of the sender. It's "antisocial". Regards, -sm
- [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a p… Martijn Grooten
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… darxus
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John R. Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Derek Diget
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Paul Smith
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Brendan Hide
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis