IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...

kent@songbird.com Wed, 04 June 2003 22:18 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA15969 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h54MI1725955 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:18:01 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h54MI0B25952 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:18:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA15954; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:17:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NgY9-0000uJ-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 18:16:05 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NgY8-0000uG-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 18:16:04 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h54MGGB25874; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:16:16 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h54MDHB25775 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:13:17 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA15606 for <Asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 18:13:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: kent@songbird.com
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NgTY-0000tU-00 for Asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 18:11:20 -0400
Received: from owl.icann.org ([192.0.35.114] helo=localhost.localdomain) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NgTX-0000tQ-00 for Asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 18:11:19 -0400
Received: (from kent@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h54MCbJ05911 for Asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:12:37 -0700
To: Asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...
Message-ID: <20030604221237.GL3234@owl.songbird.com>
References: <2A1D4C86842EE14CA9BC80474919782E0D21BB@mou1wnexm02.verisign.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2A1D4C86842EE14CA9BC80474919782E0D21BB@mou1wnexm02.verisign.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 15:12:37 -0700

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 08:55:53AM -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
[...]
> Fixing on the 'bulk' aspect is only solving the problem from the ISP's point
> of view. From the users point of view the fact that the email was sent to
> ten or a million other people is irrelevant.

The volume of spam (whatever the definition) is its primary irritation
(I wouldn't care about spam if I only got one nigerian scam a year), and
bulk mailing is the primary cause of that volume.  Hence, "bulk" is
indeed quite relevant to the individual. 

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
Manager of Technical Operations, ICANN      lonesome."
crispin@icann.org,kent@songbird.com                    -- Mark Twain
               p: +1 310 823 9358  f: +1 310 823 8649
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status