RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
Kee Hinckley <nazgul@somewhere.com> Fri, 23 May 2003 21:49 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA27163 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4NLnJA02984 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:49:19 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4NLnJB02981 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:49:19 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA27154; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:49:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JKOF-0002wQ-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:47:51 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JKOE-0002wN-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:47:50 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4NLhOB02799; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:43:24 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4NLgpB02776 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:42:51 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA27048 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:42:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JKHz-0002uL-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:41:23 -0400
Received: from www.somewhere.com ([66.92.72.194] helo=somewhere.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JKHy-0002uI-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:41:23 -0400
Received: from [66.92.72.194] (account nazgul HELO [192.168.1.104]) by somewhere.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 2382813; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:42:50 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: nazgul@somewhere.com@pop.messagefire.com
Message-Id: <p0600130fbaf441d4ad93@[192.168.1.104]>
In-Reply-To: <16076.18492.891355.676339@world.std.com>
References: <01C31F2F.24E92910.eric@infobro.com> <16076.18492.891355.676339@world.std.com>
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
From: Kee Hinckley <nazgul@somewhere.com>
Subject: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
Cc: asrg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 17:29:45 -0400
At 11:47 PM -0400 5/21/03, Barry Shein wrote: > > > As I noted in my mail. This appears to be happening now--although I > > > had not seen symptoms of it before. Is anyone else starting to see > > > low-level occasional bounce back from spam? > > > > > > Prior to that, all of the bounce-back instances I had heard of or > > > experienced (and I used to get one or two a week) were major--where > > > the entire spam load got sent out with the same return address. > >Could this be that spammer tactic where they pair names and forge the >From: to appear to be coming from someone they think you might have >whitelisted? I've seen pairing, although it could just be pairing by domain, rather than a database of pairs. The other thing I've noticed is spam coming in for several users at a host, with the subject customized for one of them. So the spammer is doing some limited amount of per-user customization, but rather than send 10 messages to a single server, they are sending one message to all recipients at that server. Only one of the recipients gets the correct customization. What I find particularly intriguing about the above was that the recipients were per mail *server*, not domain. In other words, I would get a single spam message with multiple recipients, one of whom was at hinckley.com, and another at somewhere.com. The only relationship being that they share the same mail server. So someone is pre-sorting their spam database by MX records, and then doing form-based mailings to the first recipient for the given MX. A compromise between speed and attractiveness of the message. -- Kee Hinckley http://www.messagefire.com/ Junk-Free Email Filtering http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's. _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Scott Nelson
- [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM add… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Fred Bacon
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Eric Dean
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Tom Thomson
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Richard Rognlie
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Clayton, Nik [IT]
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of M… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… wayne
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Chris Lewis