Re: [Asrg] [ASRG] SMTP pull anyone?

Jeff Macdonald <macfisherman@gmail.com> Wed, 26 August 2009 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <macfisherman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E6E3A70A0 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PFRnKg5qY4mm for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com (mail-ew0-f206.google.com [209.85.219.206]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E264128C2D7 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so311637ewy.17 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=S7LlVaAduFMAFHe4G0wwLoRKKRTrGZBHZlBjRyJanjY=; b=kHqgkWwqoZcd0JzgmOfrSSptlcQh/hXPo8cOB00ALnT/OjA3RyiqPXwQUSZRq38jhb QXaoMbZma6JYCKGgBjCNFS60obpnsVSJkx2gTdas6id6J15EyBHJ49GZLv3/FGMlGKUB xolP+fO3V6mjqjqPv9628rdVrg0LmWXnbxRuc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HUct62jjCzBKiGrPIXMdhBDEBkui6pI8ekW5Yc5j5JUW0kbiC76sauOHQXuV+bJB7F sJgBuQp9CEBnqrQaJ/GzaashJgqhkHGJrN276+EmSATQmdBpSIX2EFov5PgnFlafWZNF Zk0q8YfoJzgiw2RgstzQ2KYsWyGvB9KpqXNXw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.210.27.20 with SMTP id a20mr4128501eba.28.1251302818783; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090818020952.GA30677@gsp.org>
References: <922a897b0908170253k60c0d57dh5e593c78f9137fab@mail.gmail.com> <20090817144450.GA22048@gsp.org> <4A898440.6080006@mail-abuse.org> <20090818020952.GA30677@gsp.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:06:58 -0400
Message-ID: <45ae90370908260906t223ea020g1e964670fad7ef0d@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Macdonald <macfisherman@gmail.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Asrg] [ASRG] SMTP pull anyone?
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:09:22 -0000

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Rich Kulawiec<rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:24:32AM -0700, Douglas Otis wrote:
>> Could you provide a brief outline regarding what constitutes an
>> efficient anti-spam solution?
>
> Sure.  In brief (really brief!) and in (rough) order of application
>        and increasing resource cost:

<snip very detailed list>

Rich, does ipv6 change any of this?


-- 
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA