RE: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction
"Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com> Thu, 22 May 2003 06:39 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA02188 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:39:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4M678M27383 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:07:08 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4M678B27380 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:07:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA02181; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:39:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IjiI-00063n-00; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:38:06 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IjiI-00063k-00; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:38:06 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4M5w3B23840; Thu, 22 May 2003 01:58:03 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4M5vIB23749 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2003 01:57:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA01998 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:29:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IjYn-0005jL-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:28:17 -0400
Received: from argon.connect.org.uk ([193.110.243.33]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IjYm-0005jI-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:28:17 -0400
Received: from mmail by argon.connect.org.uk with local (connectmail/exim) id 19IjNv-0002xw-00; Thu, 22 May 2003 07:17:03 +0100
Subject: RE: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
From: Jon Kyme <jrk@merseymail.com>
Cc: ASRG <asrg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: [ConnectMail 3.5.5]
X-connectmail-Originating-IP: 193.195.0.102
Message-Id: <E19IjNv-0002xw-00@argon.connect.org.uk>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 07:17:03 +0100
Sorry - double negative - d'oh Should have been: I don't believe that an acceptance that filtering should best be per-user will preclude administrators taking steps to preserve their systems in the face of "attack". -- _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg