Re: [Asrg] whitelisting links (was Re: misconception in SPF)

darxus@chaosreigns.com Mon, 10 December 2012 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <darxus@chaosreigns.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A74721F850D for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:51:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HS_INDEX_PARAM=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gx4sWxi6536H for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:51:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from panic.chaosreigns.com (panic.chaosreigns.com [IPv6:2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe96:340b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AF721F84E8 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:51:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by panic.chaosreigns.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3034CB3344; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:52 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=chaosreigns.com; s=mail; t=1355161912; bh=mWNpLA31S617JlFpuaeR6DdWdI/M6t21S37AHl69114=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=t4ydsI+ERhcVydQIHBAuKZaQRN84nNe5lOUAoOM3Ez5Uf6wrS01xCOGoLP1JpZVZH tOUf/xGWbROg0Jd6QS6Mzeib8Ae+7y/i/E3GVcXc2ddmBeetPZqvEqrkx7vie1tgTE 1/PyVfowwJP+bCLjh6H1QcdG0GtpsNtt9c1Rhzug=
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:52 -0500
From: darxus@chaosreigns.com
To: asrg@irtf.org
Message-ID: <20121210175152.GU12261@chaosreigns.com>
References: <50C4A7F8.3010201@dcrocker.net> <CAFdugamTbTirVV2zXKOmc9oTaCS+QiTemhT=jvYJnHYscHQK7g@mail.gmail.com> <0D79787962F6AE4B84B2CC41FC957D0B20ACE6D0@ABN-EXCH1A.green.sophos> <20121209213307.D90C12429B@panix5.panix.com> <CAFduganBR_E-ui-3Xbic6F7qSmg1-Q+ideXLvb+1isLz8OF0Nw@mail.gmail.com> <0D79787962F6AE4B84B2CC41FC957D0B20ACFFE1@ABN-EXCH1A.green.sophos> <50C5A9A0.105@pscs.co.uk> <0D79787962F6AE4B84B2CC41FC957D0B20AD01B2@ABN-EXCH1A.green.sophos> <20121210145627.GA21217@gsp.org> <50C6121D.9040607@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50C6121D.9040607@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] whitelisting links (was Re: misconception in SPF)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:51:54 -0000

On 12/10, Dave Crocker wrote:
>    1.  Create a whitelist of links the user employes regularly
> through its browser.  For an extra measure of safety, query the user
> about how much they 'trust' the site associated with each link.

If we could get that kind of information from end users, reliably, I don't
think we'd have a spam problem.

-- 
'1960: "I have a great idea! lets have every person in the country carry
a radio tracking beacon!" "That'll never fly!"  2012: "I can has TWO
iphones??"' - http://bash.org/?952948
http://www.ChaosReigns.com