Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records)

Matt Sergeant <msergeant@startechgroup.co.uk> Wed, 05 March 2003 14:44 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA01827 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:44:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h25EtiO31300 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:55:44 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h25Eti531297 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:55:44 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA01807; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:44:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h25Es2531254; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:54:02 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h25Er9531202 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:53:09 -0500
Received: from matt-dev.int.star.co.uk (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id JAA01773 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:41:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 7389 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 14:42:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.2.100.178?) (10.2.100.178) by matt?dev.int.star.co.uk with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 14:42:00 -0000
From: Matt Sergeant <msergeant@startechgroup.co.uk>
X-X-Sender: matt@localhost.localdomain
To: "David F. Skoll" <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>
cc: "asrg@ietf.org" <asrg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303050921200.2189@shishi.roaringpenguin.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303051455140.28546-100000@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 14:56:17 +0000

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, David F. Skoll wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> 
> > Spam costs ISPs a lot in admin time,
> 
> Ah, forgot about that... I guess you have to handle complaints.  Sorry.

Not just complaints. When your queues fill up due to massive spam runs and 
you can't even get your legitimate mail out because it's swamped by all 
the spam, then someone has to go in and manually free up the queues.

This happens a *lot* to us.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg