Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)

Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> Sun, 07 February 2010 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <schaefer@closedmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF103A714E for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:46:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NkEydYQBTh1B for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D8C3A68ED for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from torch.brasslantern.com ([unknown] [173.67.92.79]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0KXG00HWTAE6MHF6@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for asrg@irtf.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:46:59 -0600 (CST)
Received: from torch.brasslantern.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by torch.brasslantern.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o172krYa015975 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:46:53 -0800
Received: (from schaefer@localhost) by torch.brasslantern.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id o172krZJ015974 for asrg@irtf.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:46:53 -0800
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <100206184653.ZM15973@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:46:53 -0800
In-reply-to: <4B6DB6D1.5050805@dcrocker.net>
Comments: In reply to Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> "[Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)" (Feb 6, 10:37am)
References: <4B6C6D35.1050101@nortel.com> <4B6D41E3.8000209@tana.it> <4B6DAD0C.3020109@nortel.com> <4B6DB6D1.5050805@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:46:14 -0000

On Feb 6, 10:37am, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
>       [1]  Is the same as for submitting regular new mail, that is, normal
>            posting.  (Determination of the address to send to is a separate
>            issue.)

+1