Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework

"Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com> Thu, 15 May 2003 10:00 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA02140 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2003 06:00:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4F9QvH15400 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 05:26:57 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4F9QuB15397 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2003 05:26:56 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA02127; Thu, 15 May 2003 05:59:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GFYC-0005XN-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 06:01:24 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GFYB-0005XK-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 06:01:23 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4F9PIB15332; Thu, 15 May 2003 05:25:18 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4F9OtB15284 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2003 05:24:55 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA02090 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2003 05:57:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GFWF-0005Wl-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 05:59:23 -0400
Received: from argon.connect.org.uk ([193.110.243.33]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GFWE-0005Wi-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 05:59:22 -0400
Received: from mmail by argon.connect.org.uk with local (connectmail/exim) id 19GFWa-0006OG-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:59:44 +0100
In-Reply-To: <MBEKIIAKLDHKMLNFJODBMEPDFCAA.eric@purespeed.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework
To: Eric Dean <eric@purespeed.com>
From: Jon Kyme <jrk@merseymail.com>
Cc: ASRG <asrg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: [ConnectMail 3.5.4]
X-connectmail-Originating-IP: 172.25.243.3
Message-Id: <E19GFWa-0006OG-00@argon.connect.org.uk>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:59:44 +0100

> of
> My intent is to throw something down on the table that's at
> least wrong and allow for an exchange of ideas regarding how to proceed
> if
> at all.
> 
> 
<quote>
Privacy
Concerns exist regarding data collection of correspondences between certain
senders and recipients however such information is available in most
mailing systems
</quote>

Well, that's just a red rag to *some* bulls :-)

I don't think that asserting that the same concerns apply to *other*
systems
adequately addresses concerns applying to *these* systems. Plus also - it's
not strictly true, since the *necessarily* long life of this data in a C/R
system has implications.


Another thing, may be I misread the text, but I can't see how (if multiple)
 X-CM-Recipient / X-CM-URI header pairs are kept together. 

Do you really need two headers? couldn't all this data be parameters in one
header? Or have I really missed the point?









--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg