[Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
Paul Judge <paul.judge@ciphertrust.com> Fri, 23 May 2003 21:01 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA26001 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:01:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4NL0jK31240 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:00:45 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4NL0jB31237 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:00:45 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA25961; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:00:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JJdD-0002cj-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:59:15 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JJdC-0002cg-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:59:14 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4NKs9B30508; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:54:09 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4NKrtB30480 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:53:55 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA25647 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:53:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JJWa-0002Wy-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:52:24 -0400
Received: from mail0.ciphertrust.net ([64.238.118.69] helo=ciphertrust.net) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JJWa-0002Wv-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:52:24 -0400
Received: from ([10.0.0.6]) by mail0.ciphertrust.net with ESMTP ; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:52:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ctxchg.ciphertrust.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <G7BL4SNV>; Fri, 23 May 2003 16:41:50 -0400
Message-ID: <B1F08F445F370846AB7BEE424365F00D012F256A@ctxchg.ciphertrust.com>
From: Paul Judge <paul.judge@ciphertrust.com>
To: 'Richard Rognlie' <rrognlie@gamerz.net>, 'Yakov Shafranovich' <research@solidmatrix.com>
Cc: "'asrg@ietf.org'" <asrg@ietf.org>
Subject: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 16:41:39 -0400
> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Rognlie [mailto:rrognlie@gamerz.net] > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 3:43 PM > To: Yakov Shafranovich > Cc: asrg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the > House of Representative > > > Sadly, none of those provisions will have ANY impact on the > trash cluttering the net. they'll just move off-shore. Blanket statements like this are do not contribute significantly to the progress of these conversations. Additionally, while the second statement holds some truth. The first is far from reality. Legislation and the enforcement of it do have an effect on the spam problem. The solution to the problem includes technology, legislation, and education/best practices. The relationship between technology and legislation is a familiar one. For example, look at the problem of computer intrusions: there is a set of technology available such as firewalls and IDS to protect resourcesand they are supported by legislation to allow prosecution of and litigation against those that are determined to circumvent the technology. This same relationship is seen in something as basic as property theft: burglar alarms and door locks provide protection and they are supported by laws that provide a strong deterrence. If one actually examines the contents of some of the proposed legislation, one would notice that many of the proposals provide support based on the limits of the technology and require information necessary for the technology to be effective. As stated in the charter, "ASRG will not pursue research into legal issues of spam, other than the extent to which these issues affect, support, or constrain the technology." > On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:27:07PM -0400, Yakov Shafranovich wrote: > > Below is a CNET News.com article about a new anti-spam > proposal in the > > House: > > > > http://news.com.com/2100-1025-1009467.html > > _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg