Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button idea is pre-failed
Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Tue, 02 March 2010 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590DF3A8A8F for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:56:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.990, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BB6oP-5xKBsA for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:55:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772443A8965 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:55:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squonk.gsp.org (bltmd-207.114.17.170.dsl.charm.net [207.114.17.170]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o22EtvnE029199; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:55:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from avatar.gsp.org (avatar.gsp.org [192.168.0.11]) by squonk.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o22EvTVU017099; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:57:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from avatar.gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9ubuntu1) with ESMTP id o22EtpgQ021697; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:55:51 -0500
Received: (from rsk@localhost) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o22Eto2u021696; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:55:50 -0500
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:55:50 -0500
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr, Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <20100302145550.GA14585@gsp.org>
References: <20100302131810.GA22938@gsp.org> <4B8D181E.1010504@mines-paristech.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B8D181E.1010504@mines-paristech.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button idea is pre-failed
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:56:00 -0000
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 02:52:30PM +0100, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > I may agree with some of your arguments. But OK, you're not interested in > having user feedback. Other people are. So, let they get it. If you think > this is useless, just don't use it. It's an option : MAY, not MUST. You're missing most, if not all, of the point. I suggest you re-read my message with this idea in mind: The primary beneficiaries of a standardized, widely-deployed mechanism for a report-as-spam-button are spammers/abusers: they will own it the moment they choose and will do whatever they want with it -- which is unlikely to be good for us *whether we're using such a mechanism or not*. Were the consequences of this confined solely to those operations who might use such a mechanism, this *might* be tolerable: I could argue that they fully deserve the pain they're inflicting on themselves, and that perhaps Pavlovian conditioning would eventually kick in and get them to stop. Maybe. But that's unfortunately not the case: site A's decision to use this makes them a conscriptable-at-will attacker of site B for all values of {A, B}. I *strongly* recommend your attention to the discussion several years ago on spam-l of the consequences of Verizon's choice to use outbound SAV, wherein we all (well, maybe not "all", but those who were paying attention) got a painful object lesson in how spammers will quickly notice, study and employ ill-considered methodologies to their advantage. There are some instructive points about that experience that directly apply here -- and which should give considerable pause to anyone familar with them. ---Rsk
- [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button ide… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Martijn Grooten
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Michael Thomas
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… BOBOTEK, ALEX (ATTLABS)
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Ian Eiloart
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Ian Eiloart
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Ian Eiloart
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Ian Eiloart
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Dennis Dayman
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Paul Russell
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Ian Eiloart
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button… Chris Lewis