Re: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
mathew <meta@pobox.com> Mon, 26 May 2003 04:03 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA19804 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 26 May 2003 00:03:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4Q43IE23622 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 26 May 2003 00:03:18 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4Q43IB23619 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 26 May 2003 00:03:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA19798; Mon, 26 May 2003 00:02:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19K9Ar-000348-00; Mon, 26 May 2003 00:01:25 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19K9Ar-000345-00; Mon, 26 May 2003 00:01:25 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4Q3x2B23300; Sun, 25 May 2003 23:59:02 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4Q3wTB23259 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2003 23:58:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA19606 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 May 2003 23:58:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19K96D-000312-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 25 May 2003 23:56:37 -0400
Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com ([204.127.202.61]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19K96C-00030w-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 25 May 2003 23:56:36 -0400
Received: from pobox.com (h005018086b3b.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.45.164]) by attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with SMTP id <2003052603573800100s7gqke>; Mon, 26 May 2003 03:57:38 +0000
X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
Subject: Re: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: mathew <meta@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20030526090654.025fe990@>
To: asrg@ietf.org
X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
X-Image-Url: http://meta.ATH0.com/photos/MailPictures/meta@pobox.com
Message-Id: <306F975D-8F2E-11D7-A0DD-00039380F1B6@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 23:57:37 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 19:15 US/Eastern, Troy Rollo wrote: > Did any of them have a real "anti-spam" law"? There's only one state > that has a true (opt-in) anti-spam law. CAUCE has been saying for > years that opt-out ant anti-forgery laws won't have any spam-reduction > impact, so pointing at such laws and saying "laws don't work" seems to > lack foundation. Furthermore, did any of them make any serious attempt at *enforcing* the law? If we see a few spammers lose their homes, and a few more are sent to jail, and the spam *still* continues with no reduction in volume, *then* I'll be prepared to accept it as evidence that legal solutions won't stop spam. mathew _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg