Re: [Asrg] VPNs vs consent

Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz <Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr> Tue, 30 June 2009 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1FA3A6E45 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lR+pfwJTeLa8 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boipeva.ensmp.fr (cobra.ensmp.fr [194.214.158.101]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E753A6E40 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (minho.ensmp.fr [10.3.5.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by boipeva.ensmp.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/JMMC-11/Feb/2009) with ESMTP id n5UAEmgq004455 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:14:49 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <4A49E61B.4010307@mines-paristech.fr>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:16:59 +0200
From: Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz <Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090507 Fedora/1.1.16-1.fc11 SeaMonkey/1.1.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <20090623213728.1825.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <4A41D773.50508@telmon.org> <4A41E506.2010106@mines-paristech.fr> <20090624160052.B5DC62428A@panix5.panix.com> <4A426B9D.7090901@mines-paristech.fr> <4A43618A.6000205@tana.it> <4A437393.3060105@mines-paristech.fr> <20090629113156.GA32258@gsp.org> <4A48BDAC.1060602@telmon.org> <4A48DFCF.9080305@mines-paristech.fr> <4A48E605.5080507@telmon.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A48E605.5080507@telmon.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Miltered: at boipeva with ID 4A49E598.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4A49E598.000/10.3.5.5/minho.ensmp.fr/localhost.localdomain/<Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] VPNs vs consent
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jose-Marcio.Martins@mines-paristech.fr, Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:17:02 -0000

Claudio Telmon wrote:
> Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:

> 
>>> official contact addresses of companies.
>> In fact, at our domain, few of these kind of adresses aren't protected.
>> Most of them are adresses of the kind "everybody in the engineering
>> department" (addresses which are of internal use only) "butterfly
>> research workgroup" (a closed group working on some particular subject)
>> and so. These are adresses which *are* protected and the concept of
>> consent-enable is materialized by checking if the SMTP client sending
>> messages to is in some known network or if the connection was
>> authenticated. But nothing prevents that this kind of consent should be
>> expanded. Either way, in an organisation like the ours, users couldn't
>> understand that the same consent system used for individual addresses
>> couldn't be used for collective addresses.
> 
> This is a very interesting case. I'll have to think at the implications
> of it.

You got the message ! 8-)

And as said Rich, I'm only pointing you points to taking into account.