Re: [Asrg] VPNs vs consent

[Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz <[e-mail]>]

Claudio Telmon wrote:
> Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:

> 
>>> official contact addresses of companies.
>> In fact, at our domain, few of these kind of adresses aren't protected.
>> Most of them are adresses of the kind "everybody in the engineering
>> department" (addresses which are of internal use only) "butterfly
>> research workgroup" (a closed group working on some particular subject)
>> and so. These are adresses which *are* protected and the concept of
>> consent-enable is materialized by checking if the SMTP client sending
>> messages to is in some known network or if the connection was
>> authenticated. But nothing prevents that this kind of consent should be
>> expanded. Either way, in an organisation like the ours, users couldn't
>> understand that the same consent system used for individual addresses
>> couldn't be used for collective addresses.
> 
> This is a very interesting case. I'll have to think at the implications
> of it.

You got the message ! 8-)

And as said Rich, I'm only pointing you points to taking into account.