IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Soundness of silence

Ian Eiloart <iane@sussex.ac.uk> Tue, 16 June 2009 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <iane@sussex.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3885A3A6A2F for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ei9Rbo6z6dlq for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lynndie.uscs.susx.ac.uk (lynndie.uscs.susx.ac.uk [139.184.14.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371B63A6845 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk ([139.184.134.43]:65182) by lynndie.uscs.susx.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.64) (envelope-from <iane@sussex.ac.uk>) id KLC58F-0000JC-6K for asrg@irtf.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:21:51 +0100
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:21:05 +0100
From: Ian Eiloart <iane@sussex.ac.uk>
Sender: iane@sussex.ac.uk
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <19F5E9FF50D8F6854F278DA0@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200906161301.JAA26149@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
References: <4A329E38.9010609@tana.it> <4A36904E.8040908@billmail.scconsult.com> <4A3781D4.3020303@tana.it> <200906161301.JAA26149@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01NktbQZ+syaZ3uK+jonGpwM60nMN8m5lxq7Y=; token_authority=support@its.sussex.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Sussex: true
X-Sussex-transport: remote_smtp
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Soundness of silence
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:22:58 -0000

--On 16 June 2009 08:47:51 -0400 der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> 
wrote:

> Not quite.  There are walled-garden approaches to email that are
> basically spam-free, because they have the accountability the open
> Internet lacks.

Agreed. What efforts are being made to introduce that accountability to 
email?


-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email