IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] SPF's helo identity as a reporting target

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Mon, 14 May 2012 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C35421F8463 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 07:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2QWgBAhwzrY for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 07:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53E621F845F for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 07:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squonk.gsp.org (bltmd-207.114.25.246.dsl.charm.net [207.114.25.246]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4EEMkYQ012104 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:22:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vorlon.gsp.org (vorlon.gsp.org [192.168.0.20]) by squonk.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4EEPhvu032701 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:25:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost6.localdomain6 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by vorlon.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.2ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q4EEMehr020068 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:22:40 -0400
Received: (from rsk@localhost) by localhost6.localdomain6 (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q4EEMdRU020064 for asrg@irtf.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:22:39 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:22:39 -0400
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <20120514142239.GA19490@gsp.org>
References: <4FA8FBCA.3050904@tana.it> <4FAE187B.9030902@tana.it> <4FAEA20F.8090302@mustelids.ca> <4FAF85D0.8050305@tana.it> <4FAFD34F.6010301@mustelids.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FAFD34F.6010301@mustelids.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] SPF's helo identity as a reporting target
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:22:49 -0000

On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:29:19AM -0400, Chris Lewis quoted:
> Section 4.1.1.1:

+1, and let me add:

One of the many reasons to make the HELO consistent with the FQDN is that
it can be helpful in debugging.

---rsk

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email