Re: [atoca] Call for submissions: Secure Alert Format

My apologies, I saw the discussion, but no references to active
internet drafts.  If you or Matt feel that draft-barnes-atoca-escape
is appropriate, then a -01 draft should easily rectify this
deficiency.

I had assumed that you would be doing this, but had perhaps considered
making a few changes prior to doing so.

On 4 September 2012 14:53, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote:
> Maybe you need a new mail client?  Mine shows several messages in this  thread.
>
>
> On Sep 4, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>> With a little over a week to go, we have so far received the following input:
>>
>>
>> Remember, more time under the noses of your colleagues improves our
>> chances of meeting the next deadline.
>>
>> On 17 August 2012 11:34, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The ATOCA WG needs you.
>>>
>>> It has been determined that providing a means of authenticating alerts
>>> is critical to the working group.
>>>
>>> Please submit internet drafts containing proposals that address this
>>> problem before September 12.
>>>
>>> Such a proposal must be able to carry CAP-formatted alerts in such a
>>> way that the source(s) of the alert can be authenticated by
>>> recipients.  Attributing trust to that source is not necessarily
>>> within scope, nor is it necessary to describe a protocol or delivery
>>> architecture.
>>>
>>> A submission made earlier than this date will give us more time to
>>> discuss it.  That is good if we are to meet our later milestones for
>>> adoption and publication.
>> _______________________________________________
>> atoca mailing list
>> atoca@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/atoca
>