[atoca] ATOCA status at time of closing
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 13 November 2012 23:20 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: atoca@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: atoca@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BF421F8518 for <atoca@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCFBLU9aOC5Y for <atoca@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAA021F84D5 for <atoca@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id y2so2857314lbk.31 for <atoca@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FDB0b7dL+KQEyjbb3WB5i+f9sA82fZxkIqHwgauyLkM=; b=OaiDC1Cer96mdo1vfauMruyRM2bQXh9Jbv2FRPoS9R2OTPuq5JyYThsFfTRs1AQEXm G0/YeSX/bh0fxk9xowX+h6D8uoGC8KRsyI35jrYmK/z7bNkCjOeS/27lRf7aOQiTq0IN LZX/jlgzf4EvtesdoifKTn1uKKrC0m6Xek+Y+VaYKAzMzKgUsS4w324mtEOdd3TBq1MJ +sI86mZff+EFTt1MmoRlVUuBFsKs/UaMGm9vervsdVvHnMq1bE4dQwi7U9PynnVq8QEi JlomZjv4ePdg2JPsrrfghWZFMAlcWtsmvUy1CdOi3xXsGZKLsefdf49NKsh0gmzfFBnT v5rQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.39.105 with SMTP id o9mr6316482lbk.123.1352848829942; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.83.2 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:29 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU1vbf9drbXu0qts8L+Fw1dg4LRr8w-H1ZEvfxB=YG6Uw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: atoca@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e0cb4efe2d7ef18bc104ce68a94b"
Subject: [atoca] ATOCA status at time of closing
X-BeenThere: atoca@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the IETF Authority-to-Citizen Alert \(atoca\) working group." <atoca.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/atoca>, <mailto:atoca-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/atoca>
List-Post: <mailto:atoca@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:atoca-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/atoca>, <mailto:atoca-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:20:32 -0000
In addition to reaching rough consensus on closing the group, the working group also concluded that it is important to record, for posterity, what course was followed to reach this point. The working group initially performed some exploration of the problem space as part of a requirements analysis process. The history of draf-ietf-atoca-requirements reveals some of the conclusions that were made during this process. Broadly speaking the following problems were identified: - point-to-point delivery of alerts publish/subscribe architectures were considered likely solutions; a candidate solution was proposed for SIP (draft-rosen-atoca-sip-cap); XMPP (XEP-0127) was also identified - point-to-multipoint delivery of alerts draft-barnes-atoca-delivery was proposed for this purpose - secure identification of alert originators a candidate solution was proposed for the alert envelope (draft-barnes-atoca-escape) - discovery of (or delegation of identification for) trusted alert originators - discovery of alert distribution channels these were not considered necessary for some classes of alerting draft-barnes-atoca-meta was proposed to address both aspects of discovery The work in the group concluded primarily due to a lack of engagement. It was not clear that there was sufficiently widespread support for the work that the group was conducting. The small number of technical contributions did not attract adequate feedback or implementation. During the course of the work it became apparent that there are some problems here that could benefit from the expertise that is available in the IETF. However, with the problem so loosely scoped, this group was considered unlikely to achieve consensus behind a solution at the present.
- [atoca] ATOCA status at time of closing Martin Thomson
- Re: [atoca] ATOCA status at time of closing Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [atoca] ATOCA status at time of closing Martin Thomson