IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: to/cc/bcc extension

Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us> Sat, 16 October 2010 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF14B3A6AE8 for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.672, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VF26aDa3d7Bz for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B213A6A6E for <atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9GMLD01024034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:21:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id o9GMLDAo024033; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:21:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail-bw0-f43.google.com (mail-bw0-f43.google.com [209.85.214.43]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9GMLCXG024028 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:21:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from bobwyman@gmail.com)
Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so2576137bwz.16 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=85XgeZPP5gKtgbNwu0244h874pIYWEj0LxUSSq3FPq0=; b=cRqFfh65CMj6ARPmZMajQt1a5C482cmFl4Ez7L2kd+O7dKiPbPTx/L4E+tOWdMgY9n kSV0Rif5BxZeBs5alUUrIT5GuEnlpFuRnUZz9N3Bq0qgoIFFQUlIvXKCvYnFDE1WJSuI Sl7MXeV2z1OfQo/J9fIZu/v7avDg2vpUaaRMc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=WYr7jpoULW3f4UlWqUOZlSbABl93qKMnrgDc7UtA94vmSVwflThVelbi20b4HS1Kmo lseMlrctp4spBl6d97QtWsiFJ4Awhm7J3DKNV6xLixP1I3yvNXJqay55XCuQ/D8KYSKF siKfb4FKjhfTQbx920dXTAm7OlZryfmlmTzos=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.112.193 with SMTP id x1mr2565254bkp.31.1287267670387; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.112.67 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=P5k0LpVxB-Q4HqeM+zZsHfoXrDuEbGZxX7PSU@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=P5k0LpVxB-Q4HqeM+zZsHfoXrDuEbGZxX7PSU@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:21:10 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8273MGx8oUCkcjBg5gXkuT8rwVI
Message-ID: <AANLkTinsvixmSyixVhkBO69AKgNicrwfF3kdbgJvHjwd@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: to/cc/bcc extension
From: Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us>
To: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Atom-Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e240b396ac20492c35cd7
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>

To, cc, and bcc are said to include the atomCommonAttributes which are base,
lang and undefined... I'm not sure I understand how either base or lang
really make sense for these elements. If they do make sense, could you
provide some examples that motivated their being included?

bob wyman

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:02 PM, James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> Wanted to draw attention to this:
>
>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-norris-atompub-audience-00.html
>
> It introduces to/cc/bcc elements to an Atom entry.
>
>   <entry>
>     ...
>     <to>acct:john.doe@example.org <acct%3Ajohn.doe@example.org></to>
>     <to>acct:bob@example.org <acct%3Abob@example.org></to>
>     <cc>acct:jane.doe@example.org <acct%3Ajane.doe@example.org></cc>
>     <cc>acct:jane@example.org <acct%3Ajane@example.org></cc>
>     <bcc>acct:jean.deux@example.org <acct%3Ajean.deux@example.org></bcc>
>     <bcc>acct:max@example.org <acct%3Amax@example.org></bcc>
>     ...
>   </entry>
>
> Comments are welcomed and requested.
>
> - James
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email