Re: to/cc/bcc extension
James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Fri, 15 October 2010 23:00 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id CBCC03A68E0 for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.595,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q7+o97NVBk4R for
<ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7483A6A2D for
<atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9FMvjqL067836
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com
(8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id o9FMvjJ2067835;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (mail-qy0-f171.google.com
[209.85.216.171]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id
o9FMvi7n067830 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jasnell@gmail.com)
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so1931759qyk.16 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=gClW3PDrhPVbTMX0JKjlPTjLkR5p0VLhGL0YWaUyBDE=;
b=u0RcxqGTz1GAGzn7/zgb+y8gJSOwoAHyBN7h+tKDzvvbSuDAPR4JRQEIM/I/f4jpr8
fVyNGV7cQX4Gzv1/e4usQzUQhAu5TLL9lp+JPTVpf07ijdDoZMaNQ+OG1BzQZZrt70DW
beR1OeKtlhPQDd1Azc0TZhphq7dvwKuK1rVwc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
b=abh0p4uEixJkZMxuMjdQdFxx7vg43COvpkfU1g2lfoqosbOxQTFtQ6LS4dbvEaGpm2
wY7vdUzMmJmVAU/Gohq0tynPHOy+Jk0OpEL4fAEJc4R63krPV4uSHhESVZZ/2VTWka30
aq0LjAL8aOqGgo2nWZPGcQ5O3jo9VPbIQWpyg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.250.81 with SMTP id mn17mr1226852qcb.291.1287183464148;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.114.194 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <989FF0D2-FD4F-48C4-AFE8-CD61C67E4A55@apple.com>
References: <AANLkTi=P5k0LpVxB-Q4HqeM+zZsHfoXrDuEbGZxX7PSU@mail.gmail.com>
<989FF0D2-FD4F-48C4-AFE8-CD61C67E4A55@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:44 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTim278qZBCgQgMiUmFVYCL26zsiuLUPcXkiBgQDe@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: to/cc/bcc extension
From: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
To: "Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D." <prabhaka@apple.com>
Cc: Atom-Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b8eb0248b7e0492afc11f
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
link certainly could be used but just doesn't seem like a good fit. Things like type, length, hreflang, nor ANY of the proposed link extensions would apply. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D. < prabhaka@apple.com> wrote: > HI James, > > Given our previous discussion about icons: why aren't these link relations > with mailto URLs? > > -- Ernie P. > > On Oct 15, 2010, at 2:02 PM, James Snell wrote: > > Wanted to draw attention to this: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-norris-atompub-audience-00.html > > It introduces to/cc/bcc elements to an Atom entry. > > <entry> > ... > <to>acct:john.doe@example.org <acct%3Ajohn.doe@example.org></to> > <to>acct:bob@example.org <acct%3Abob@example.org></to> > <cc>acct:jane.doe@example.org <acct%3Ajane.doe@example.org></cc> > <cc>acct:jane@example.org <acct%3Ajane@example.org></cc> > <bcc>acct:jean.deux@example.org <acct%3Ajean.deux@example.org></bcc> > <bcc>acct:max@example.org <acct%3Amax@example.org></bcc> > ... > </entry> > > Comments are welcomed and requested. > > - James > > >
- to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D.
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Alexander Johannesen
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension John Panzer
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Bob Wyman
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Sam Johnston
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension John Panzer
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Aristotle Pagaltzis