IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Atom revision tracking extension

James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Tue, 02 November 2010 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB3E3A69EB for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.186
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z1r7Ihv84RQ7 for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F44A3A69D8 for <atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA2IHtoZ089306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id oA2IHtfY089305; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail-vw0-f43.google.com (mail-vw0-f43.google.com [209.85.212.43]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA2IHrPa089300 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jasnell@gmail.com)
Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so5526638vws.16 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iJiItR5HBkt+qh7fSNZKo7GiFDOSIhhPddaLFKeIKYc=; b=CFWiA1kZuqQFwBFyLIEq8ds+sT0y/w00y7Fx9rlQ/vS5BM0sp/NIzyYfLiUszR7ed/ WILCQnYWF+sFAJQC6GCMvai7nDJIanWiJbO8gF3QHBqi51LdPTNAwT/XYeaUB6UkaCyh hQ5GdZiilA7LVGNZwZdToKdeCQu1Y/8tvtXwk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=xIjNk/ffTcEh1A5atAxv86p9TJ+vq+fsMGCLm4rQSGGT8am8+hKUBsVJ5zGZwK2E/4 WcinhkK0N6Hv76N4MOboNv32fP5m99og2V8WEJq4s15F31fgbW7mPCpOAPrq4DJYqt7L h/djTo7RSjlqZfB/aYWItw4rE9ycMDhJpDs0s=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.204.195 with SMTP id fn3mr6428977qab.122.1288721873262; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.54.202 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinDEis6voKYbHr6jtPOe0boBrnLR=a8Qifui+eG@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20101102111107.GA14216@skiathos> <AANLkTinDEis6voKYbHr6jtPOe0boBrnLR=a8Qifui+eG@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:17:53 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimwPZsdRSuosTk1en9Oc6QOar9z7RPnn9ODy3GA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Atom revision tracking extension
From: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Cc: Alistair Miles <alimanfoo@googlemail.com>, atom-syntax@imc.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3005dd1e785db9049415f19b"
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>

Very nice to see some of this old work being revisited. I am all for
updating and revitalizing the draft so long as there are people taking the
time to implement and provide feedback. If you can, please post a note here
with any issues you think need to be resolved and I will update the draft
accordingly.

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

>
> Hey Alistair,
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Alistair Miles <alimanfoo@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > Generally speaking, we've found this to be a very useful feature in
> several
> > applications, and would be interested in revisiting James' original I-D
> if
> > anyone else was.
> >
> > I think the draft would need updating to deal with a couple of relatively
> > minor issues we've worked around, and the fact that the new tombstones
> draft
> > [3] overlaps (see [4]). But for the most part, it works well as-is, for
> us
> > at least.
>
> I would definitely be interested in a revision to Atom Syndication
> Format Revision Tracking [1] to work better with Atom Tombstones [2],
> and also Link Relation Types for Simple Version Navigation between Web
> Resources (RFC 5829) [3].
>
> I'd be curious to hear how you are using the extension in the work you
> are doing, if you had a blog post in you, or if it could be posted
> here. Being able to express version relations on the web is very
> important for digital library applications.
>
> //Ed
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-atompub-revision-00
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones
> [3] http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc5829
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email