Re: to/cc/bcc extension
Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de> Wed, 03 November 2010 14:43 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id A0A633A69C0 for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.154
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=1.154 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001,
HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FXX3EmQJuhJQ for
<ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A1D3A69B3 for
<atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA3EbjFp046835
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:37:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com
(8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id oA3EbjYM046834;
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:37:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by
hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with SMTP id oA3EbhWp046828 for
<atom-syntax@imc.org>;
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:37:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from pagaltzis@gmx.de)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Nov 2010 14:37:42 -0000
Received: from static-87-79-236-202.netcologne.de (EHLO klangraum)
[87.79.236.202] by mail.gmx.net (mp052) with SMTP; 03 Nov 2010 15:37:42 +0100
X-Authenticated: #163624
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/yMzozjZ/yR3eU0TqW8H0ge9wp+TSPy7P+rKDwss
1bDrifULiXUd1D
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:33:31 +0100
From: Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de>
To: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: to/cc/bcc extension
Message-ID: <20101103143331.GB16326@klangraum.plasmasturm.org>
Mail-Followup-To: atom-syntax@imc.org
References: <AANLkTi=P5k0LpVxB-Q4HqeM+zZsHfoXrDuEbGZxX7PSU@mail.gmail.com>
<20101025195219.GP29843@klangraum.plasmasturm.org>
<AANLkTin4CGUjcX+b_yiSNsAzR06246bR6AtBY4bjjxtU@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin4CGUjcX+b_yiSNsAzR06246bR6AtBY4bjjxtU@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
* James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> [2010-10-25 22:10]: > Aristotle, the email application messed up the markup... it's > supposed to be just... > > <to> acct: john.doe @ example.org </to> > > (I added some spaces to try to keep the example from being > messed up again) I see; my “ick” reaction to micro-parsing is hereby withdrawn. Still it doesn’t change my counterproposal. Are you sure you will under no circumstances ever want display name to show a user? And that email is the pinnacle of, the one true form of, electronic identity? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
- to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D.
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Alexander Johannesen
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension John Panzer
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Bob Wyman
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Sam Johnston
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension John Panzer
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Aristotle Pagaltzis