Re: rfc 5005 implemention/deployment?
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 13 September 2010 03:10 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id ABDA53A68D9 for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-103.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.388, BAYES_05=-1.11,
HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UEj6M5l4P5bW for
<ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC023A68D8 for
<atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8D2oncb064017
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:50:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com
(8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id o8D2onHg064016;
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:50:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by
hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8D2omnb064011
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for
<atom-syntax@imc.org>;
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:50:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mnot@mnot.net)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.54.190]) (using TLSv1
with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2B7F509DB;
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:50:46 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: rfc 5005 implemention/deployment?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C8BB3B7.1020400@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:50:43 +1000
Cc: atom-syntax@imc.org
Message-Id: <D2A8E30E-3644-43E7-876A-E771CB9FC05E@mnot.net>
References: <4C8BB3B7.1020400@gmail.com>
To: Zhiwu Xie <zxie.lists@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hoffman.proper.com id
o8D2onna064012
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
My impression is that paging (i.e., prev and next) are somewhat common, but that archiving (prevarchive, nextarchive) are not as widely used; most of the places I have seen or heard about it being used are behind firewalls. Cheers, On 12/09/2010, at 2:52 AM, Zhiwu Xie wrote: > > Hi list, > > Wonder if you know any feed paging/archiving implementation and deployment out there? Mark Nottingham mentioned a while ago that Sixapart was interested but I didn't see it being used in livejournal or alike. > > Thank you, > > Zhiwu Xie > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- rfc 5005 implemention/deployment? Zhiwu Xie
- Re: rfc 5005 implemention/deployment? Mark Nottingham
- Re: rfc 5005 implemention/deployment? Martin Atkins