Re: Atom-filtering

Erlend Hamnaberg <ngarthl@gmail.com> Mon, 12 March 2012 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDC821F870A for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.067
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.067 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.468, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id snI728ahdq8Q for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F3721F8701 for <atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2C9JRPq026869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:19:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.13.5/Submit) id q2C9JRpY026868; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:19:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2C9JQ80026861 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:19:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ngarthl@gmail.com)
Received: by yenl11 with SMTP id l11so3533051yen.16 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1kiNraOTMg/38Hsaxa5J+K3R4+VkGRxBGxQRvQciEK4=; b=VzxS1VGmHggkVT6DrRrscWTwfPgpBLhe/NG5kpDiJxx9fs7+Pfs5EFsavNpSnqRgzy TzdaJS+gYtApEqsgYIYlPXvwIV1kGoHQ9xqcPe8LSFqU8uiB2OBWXEtw/5libAtR5FKl 3QO/jvmNmtP2nj+MGKpoT+qpT9uZbZR3IeVvHHLHYfBXGOT0driBFSb5QDNi5aSn7b+d C0yUcfQppik886T222cSNCxf3Aas5oxnd4G70SM+5My8k1b98a2RZI5GcClW0T/mjazI QeHnVUtHFgXG1IwSBmZ1ggVDE8d3wQwT6LgSMLl7x2E7On905fMp22/LH95dmu2VaDFP JgWQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.12.230 with SMTP id b6mr6449221oec.54.1331543965668; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.75.229 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201203101738.23955.thomas@koch.ro>
References: <CAKj3E3b-daB36y2UA3zopsiYO0jb99uMJoQQuE4S92DsA-bxqw@mail.gmail.com> <201203101738.23955.thomas@koch.ro>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:19:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKj3E3aLg9Mno0sxr=KC6F0tAtK53GseF=9aUJr6B4JoO71XMA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Atom-filtering
From: Erlend Hamnaberg <ngarthl@gmail.com>
To: thomas@koch.ro
Cc: atom-syntax@imc.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Thomas Koch <thomas@koch.ro> wrote:
> Erlend Hamnaberg:
>> Hello people.
>>
>> I've tried to find something like atom-filtering on the interwebs, but it
>> does not seems to be anything like this available.
>>
>> So: here is my attempt for creating a atom-filter extension:
>>
>> http://tihlde.org/~erlenha/draft-hamnaberg-opensearch-filter-00.html
>>
>> Please send any comments, recommendations.
>>
>> Please also look at the examples in the Appendix for which one would be
>> preferred.
> Hallo Erlend,
>
> Isn't searching already a kind of filter? When you search in a collection
> you're effectively filtering the collection, aren't you?
>
> Regards,
>
> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro

Hello Thomas.

I guess you could say that.

This extension adds filtering in a more specific sense as it would be
possible to limit the choices available.

A search in itself is unbounded.

--
Erlend