Re: to/cc/bcc extension
Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> Fri, 15 October 2010 22:57 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7A4903A6AD4 for <ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-0.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74,
HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ftpv-mziayLJ for
<ietfarch-atompub-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147483A68E0 for
<atompub-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9FMsOlq067721
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com
(8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id o9FMsOnK067720;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to
owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail-wy0-f171.google.com (mail-wy0-f171.google.com
[74.125.82.171]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id
o9FMsNbI067715 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
alexander.johannesen@gmail.com)
Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so1458998wya.16 for <atom-syntax@imc.org>;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4nrhAip1/jQF1JEKW0PMrf4T+7Ud4ldiVJgKmz3dc7M=;
b=luZvI/hhGMNdHkaa7dNrphJaaX48Itid8YixJjyOs+GLu3W/nZjR/+A04qbFEftm85
XGrkmD37Ql9Qc+qvs5kc13rjxFTdaQmx6AFkJfXdZW9OsMpQeHmSHuQi5cW3mRqhMX9E
EkEKJvzhkFEE/XisKnN/IuMG1Q9y2k6dtBa9Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=tOXH8rit3o+KJ9WXdAKlqRPhi15DeO5D8x4NuXFphMmnOeWodI9PZHaIewYzPqP0qe
U/ZGvWBBA3AG/cJg0Kjwf4vaI9NFMc7DdzVzCNVNY2Vu1frUe1FhtcVPNLah+5bJlFNM
sHSC5kfHSZSjR7eHrA7kr17HKtzLp0NLstywg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.3.145 with SMTP id 17mr2191162weh.109.1287183253410;
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.155.129 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <989FF0D2-FD4F-48C4-AFE8-CD61C67E4A55@apple.com>
References: <AANLkTi=P5k0LpVxB-Q4HqeM+zZsHfoXrDuEbGZxX7PSU@mail.gmail.com>
<989FF0D2-FD4F-48C4-AFE8-CD61C67E4A55@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:54:13 +1100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=P=N7qa3xzK7-AmdS9KLhL6xG=DFRR72eX3cLW@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: to/cc/bcc extension
From: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com>
To: "Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D." <prabhaka@apple.com>
Cc: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Atom-Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hoffman.proper.com id
o9FMsObI067716
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
*grumble* > Given our previous discussion about icons: why aren't these link relations > with mailto URLs? Not meant to fixate this on the follow-up'er, but everything you ever wanted and extend Atom with is just conceptual things. There is no difference between a defined ontology with all the entities and relationships of Atom, and in fact you can define the whole shebang in any ontological language. It just so happens that Atom is a short-list of ontological expression defined in a format of sorts. Where do the data model, format it's defined in and the ontology stop and start? At some point the Atom model becomes so complex that it loses its easy applicability, and perhaps should enter the realm of ontological work. Anyone done any mappings of this so far? Kind regards, Alex -- Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps --- http://shelter.nu/blog/ ---------------------------------------------- ------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---
- to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D.
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Alexander Johannesen
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension John Panzer
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Bob Wyman
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Sam Johnston
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension James Snell
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension John Panzer
- Re: to/cc/bcc extension Aristotle Pagaltzis