From apaloma@amsl.com Thu Feb 15 09:22:39 2024 Return-Path: X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A895C14F5EB; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:22:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.208 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I5cE_C1PGykz; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2231AC14F610; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:21:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A60424B455; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:21:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xwB4CMA9E1Ge; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:21:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:65a2:2250:8523:20ff:c69c:bf02]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9B88424B432; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:21:53 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\)) From: Alanna Paloma In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:21:43 -0800 Cc: Carsten Bormann , "Murray S. Kucherawy" , RFC Errata System , jsonpath-ads@ietf.org, jsonpath-chairs@ietf.org, Tim Bray , auth48archive Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <16AE55F5-57C6-476B-B894-6A80AF43E464@amsl.com> References: <20240130062410.D02DF1E64A@rfcpa.amsl.com> <8DDA3557-E82D-4A29-9AFA-DDD82BBA13B2@tzi.org> <5AB46EE0-BA9C-4C37-BA1E-FA47FD41EBEF@amsl.com> <5DD56C57-47EB-4836-B81C-C1B65A64BC2E@tzi.org> <493459CE-04C9-4989-BBA4-536F583ACF46@tzi.org> <4DAEBB01-2BC0-473D-9A92-711E7FD711F7@amsl.com> <3C0CDCF7-C19C-4581-AD67-4739D5890957@tzi.org> <45761E29-D26D-4D73-A5A3-D0226A2C43C2@tzi.org> <65029830-B4BA-4684-ACCD-E0D1E5654D55@tzi.org> <7A941E33-B09B-408B-A6C2-3ABFF021B623@amsl.com> <2293B0D9-E3BC-4094-9FB9-881E09736FD6@tzi.org> <496E2EF4-1BD5-4BAB-980B-79B3B0B1F979@tzi.org> To: =?utf-8?Q?Stefan_G=C3=B6ssner?= , Glyn Normington X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9535 for your review X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:22:39 -0000 Hi Glyn and Stefan, Thank you for your approvals. We have noted them on the AUTH48 status = page: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9535 Once we=E2=80=99ve received approval from Murray (AD), we will continue = with the publication process. Thank you, RFC Editor/ap > On Feb 15, 2024, at 4:30=E2=80=AFAM, Stefan G=C3=B6ssner = wrote: >=20 > Approved ... >=20 > Am 15.02.2024 um 00:36 schrieb Alanna Paloma: >>=20 >> Greetings, >>=20 >> Murray (AD) - Please see = to review and = approve of the following changes: >> -Section 1.1: added, deleted, and updated text >> -Section 2.5.1.1: updated sourcecode >> -Appendix A: updated sourcecode >>=20 >> Carsten - Thank you for the updated XML file. We have updated the = files accordingly and noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9535 >>=20 >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535.pdf >>=20 >> The relevant diff files have been posted here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535-diff.html (comprehensive = diff) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 = changes) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff = diff between last version and this) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff = between last version and this) >>=20 >> Once we have received approvals from Stefan, Glyn, and Murray (AD), = we will ask IANA to update their registry accordingly. After the IANA = updates are complete, we will move forward with the publication process. >>=20 >> Thank you, >> RFC Editor/ap >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Feb 14, 2024, at 1:01 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi Alanna, >>>=20 >>> On 2024-02-14, at 11:25, Carsten Bormann wrote: >>>=20 >>>> [=E2=80=A6] >>>> I am collecting a few other changes in the XML at the repo now and = included this change (=E2=80=9CC4=E2=80=9D, c8dfc85). >>>>=20 >>>> We=E2=80=99ll indicate when this updated XML is ready for = consumption by the RPC. >>>>=20 >>> This is now complete at: >>>=20 >>> = https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/blob/auth48/a= uth48/rfc9535.xml >>>=20 >>> The remaining changes are: >>>=20 >>> 9ad9249 * (C9) We now distinguish empty nodelists from Nothing >>> 904cefb * (C8) Avoid superfluous "strict" in table 11, twice >>> 5b6ac37 * (C7) use past tense for IANA registration that has = happened >>> 33b6c01 * (C1) 3 more word-joiners to avoid confusing line breaks >>> 440d44a * (C6) simplify editorial memento for ES4 >>> 8076529 * (C5) Remove overzealous duplicate redundant superfluous = citation >>> c8dfc85 * (C4) Complete fix for placement of "at most". >>>=20 >>> (Details at >>> = https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/commits/auth4= 8/ >>> with more explanation behind the =E2=80=A2=E2=80=A2=E2=80=A2.) >>>=20 >>> A diff of the plaintext renderings is at: >>>=20 >>> https://tzi.org/~cabo/9535/rfc9535.txt-from-.diff.html >>>=20 >>> With these changes, I now believe RFC9535-to-be is ready for = publication. >>> I expect the other authors will indicate their status in time. >>>=20 >>> (There is no need to wait for resolution of >>> https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/1103 >>> =E2=80=94 even though the tables will look slightly less cramped in = plaintext when that has been fixed.) >>>=20 >>> Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20