IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] Another addressing model for AUTOCONF

Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com> Fri, 23 July 2010 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8F43A687B for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.402, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xyjFhF5FPQ8T for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6D73A657C for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so56856eyb.31 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=wK5jhwHhegQQz02Q4rP6drj3MtK+v1rx5q+rzILyn/8=; b=YgOQH7JxXDXU+yjSPK7d5EgRf6sAPF5ztQUI4wwE/1YExAg+gakpXc50yWZdSvwNcg mRBxEyCrDGi6NX2fATLyY1HSY90rpJvVMrimorYsR4lXspEPgoybJNCcwD4Ky04kUIYh GFLh/yKyUj+iTJs831IaYwuunOWXMhhCGiEVk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=o3gWzmulfn3EDoTjS5/HZlK0fSjVnErocPmy23LETsy9OrZOiLABinSqzDTMCbtnYt iLk5XCRoepAe1VP7TTY1vD+h5t7Prm4WIoQ0RlUBVhtryNV72rcX2MXvJJzO964rmHc7 HmkthTTW+H8vNN6s37DiJ8MKNqgfa4zYYMEmU=
Received: by 10.213.31.143 with SMTP id y15mr2599389ebc.38.1279894548028; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core2.localnet (static-87-79-93-195.netcologne.de [87.79.93.195]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm442835eeh.23.2010.07.23.07.15.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>
To: autoconf@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:14:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo-r2; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <4C48B1AE.2030408@gmail.com> <279CC75B-84C2-4646-82E0-023DDED29C15@inf-net.nl> <4C49A1B0.2010204@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C49A1B0.2010204@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1382141.7I2PaQmG56"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201007231615.45447.hrogge@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Another addressing model for AUTOCONF
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:15:33 -0000

Am Freitag 23 Juli 2010, 16:05:36 schrieb Alexandru Petrescu:
> > Back to Autoconf: we are looking for solutions for configuring
> > addresses / prefixes for nodes that require multi-hop communication,
> > without restrictions for packet relaying via same interface, either
> > for isolated MANETs and / or for MANETs connected to the Internet.
> 
> Ok, deserves another thread, but I don't understand your "without
> restrictions for packet relaying via same interface".  My mechanism does
> not relay packets via the same interface.
You need "relaying via the same interface" for MANET autoconfiguration. Many 
MANET nodes only have a single interface.

Henning Rogge

-- 
1) You can't win.
2) You can't break even.
3) You can't leave the game.
— The Laws of Thermodynamics, summarized

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email