[Autoconf] Unnumbered interfaces
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 27 March 2009 00:33 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20A628C1B7 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.506, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PrRt-kocew2r for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9011828C1B9 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E79D48037 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:34:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bur91-3-82-239-213-32.fbx.proxad.net [82.239.213.32]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109D9D4807D for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:34:13 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <49CC1EFF.4020801@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:34:07 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: autoconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090326-0, 26/03/2009), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: [Autoconf] Unnumbered interfaces
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:28 -0000
During the meeting there was talk about unnumbered interfaces. Trying to understand them leads to the posted informal Cisco pointer: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094e8d.shtml And a search at tools.ietf.org leads to RFCs: CR-LDP, RSVP, ptp-over-LAN link-state, RIPv2 MIB, OSPF/FrameRelay, OSPF multi-area adjacency, GMPLS. One wouldn't make the AUTOCONF ad-hoc addressing architecture dependent on e.g. OSPF/FrameRelay. But that's just an opinion of course, and technical advantage could be discussed... e.g. the change of src address was discussed - why is this feature needed? If we need that feature of change of src address - how could that be achieved without unnumbered interfaces? Alex
- [Autoconf] Unnumbered interfaces Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Unnumbered interfaces Ryuji Wakikawa