Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 16 February 2010 20:19 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id EFCBF3A73A5 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:19:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.723,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v6bLfXB38Xdn for
<autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:19:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08133A735F for <autoconf@ietf.org>;
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:19:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr
(Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE90D48201 for <autoconf@ietf.org>;
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:20:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bur91-3-82-239-213-32.fbx.proxad.net
[82.239.213.32]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D4CD4812D for
<autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:20:32 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4B7AFE0E.8010100@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:20:30 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: autoconf@ietf.org
References: <6565C346-EBE5-425A-9291-BBCA4A9FCE27@gmail.com>
<4B7AF98B.7050806@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B7AF98B.7050806@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100216-1, 16/02/2010), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list
<autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>,
<mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>,
<mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:19:05 -0000
Le 16/02/2010 21:01, Jari Arkko a écrit : > Great. Lets move this doc forward! YEs, let's move this forward and add multicast discussion to it without which autoconf can't fly. Multicast is what typical autoconfiguration protocols use today without which they'd never work. Multicast is what IPv6 got builtin precisely for the reason of autoconfing. This draft being silent about multicast spells it's not autoconf, IMHO. Alex > > Jari > > Ryuji Wakikawa kirjoitti: >> Dear All, >> >> We have concluded the WGLC of >> draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-01.txt on Dec/23/09, and have a -02 >> document issued, following up on this. >> >> Thanks to all for all the reviews and comments to this document! >> >> After Thomas and I (Chairs) carefully reviewed discussions on the >> mailing list, we do find that there is rough consensus for the current >> document. >> >> There was an individual objection to the description of the use of >> link-local address, but we did not detect wide support within the >> working group. This objection will, of course, be reflected in the PROTO >> write-up that will be sent to the IESG and the ADs, and reflected in the >> tracker. >> >> As a conclusion, we have established rough consensus to the new document. >> >> The WG chairs will start preparing the PROTO writeup for forwarding the >> document. >> >> Thanks, >> >> WG chairs >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Autoconf mailing list > Autoconf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf >
- [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Ryuji Wakikawa
- [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-autoco… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Zach Shelby
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Henning Rogge
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Henning Rogge
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu