Re: [Autoconf] radio neighbors in range

"Stan Ratliff (sratliff)" <sratliff@cisco.com> Fri, 27 February 2009 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B290B28C395 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:57:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6iHLEpvrgYw for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:57:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4CB28C1EF for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:57:23 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,277,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="38685084"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2009 18:57:46 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n1RIvj0m008242; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:57:45 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1RIvjg1010910; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:57:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.43]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:57:45 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:57:45 -0500
Message-ID: <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76407AD0C74@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <49A832DF.4040805@gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: radio neighbors in range
Thread-Index: AcmZCncwfbrwcfmbRhKcbqL+zob2wQAAqP1A
References: <499F0BA7.90501@piuha.net> <7E8A76F7-2CE0-463A-8EE8-8877C46B4715@gmail.com> <49A6D436.7020505@gmail.com> <000001c99845$1dc56190$595024b0$@nl> <49A6F125.40400@gmail.com> <1235680887.4585.5.camel@localhost><49A7BB89.5040807@gmail.com> <003901c998cb$42b71e90$c8255bb0$@nl><49A7E97A.2010503@gmail.com> <006801c998fd$06c5bd60$14513820$@nl> <49A8272D.2060400@gmail.com> <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76407AD0C48@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com> <49A83172.70105@gmail.com> <49A832DF.4040805@gmail.com>
From: "Stan Ratliff (sratliff)" <sratliff@cisco.com>
To: "Alexandru Petrescu" <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Feb 2009 18:57:45.0848 (UTC) FILETIME=[46D0BF80:01C9990D]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=754; t=1235761065; x=1236625065; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=sratliff@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Stan=20Ratliff=20(sratliff)=22=20<sratliff@cisc o.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20radio=20neighbors=20in=20range |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Alexandru=20Petrescu=22=20<alexandru.petrescu@gma il.com>; bh=8FYRqixWWcwgwOkEYcX9JK/cXSHxKaMMCiZdeDXYhd0=; b=WDDdO8jC2EOyEoPgxOZSpROsXYwdffiS1YcwE3rZAUCq+KGE937/Sb9l4O uXwQgBV81AQd/JNQBAb/DneFxy9nxj1AioAB6fEnNsKBGQ/89h8tO/eAyYGW 49kDYIwy3q;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=sratliff@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] radio neighbors in range
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:57:24 -0000

OK, I can go with the "fully transitive" verbiage. I don't think the
hidden-terminal problem applies here, because that's going to happen
regardless of the transitivity of the radio link(s). 

Regards,
Stan 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 1:37 PM
> To: Stan Ratliff (sratliff)
> Cc: Teco Boot; autoconf@ietf.org
> Subject: radio neighbors in range
> 
> To my understanding, mentioning radio neighbors in range 
> implies we discover they're risking hidden-terminal and 
> non-transitive problems.
> 
> Neighbors in fully transitive range with exposed terminals 
> would be more precise.
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
>