IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] Next steps?

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Mon, 22 March 2010 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295153A69B2 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.449, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5NAzg2bSzx0 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B6A28C130 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so1985467fxm.29 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.49.83 with SMTP id u19mr4441946bkf.157.1269295198115; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BA7E52C.9050403@piuha.net>
References: <1266925311.4036.71.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <4B882EB5.4070605@gmail.com> <4BA7E52C.9050403@piuha.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:57 -0700
Message-ID: <25c114b91003221459k63900ba7rf79e3ae26e81dc0a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325559876661a0f04826ad16b
Cc: "autoconf@ietf.org" <autoconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Next steps?
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:59:48 -0000

I agree with Jari on this point.

To the chairs: is there already an agenda for the meeting? Will there be
solutions presented?

Ulrich

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

> Alex,
>
>
>  In the solution space I am interested in the use of link-local addresses
>> and of multicast link-scoped addresses.
>>
>> I hope these are not forbidden by the IPv6 addressing architecture
>> document, which seems to be sent to the IESG now.
>>
>
> Actually, I *do* want to see the working group's solutions build on top of
> the address model that we have just completed. And it does discourage the
> use of link-local addresses. Lets not return to that discussion, I would be
> more interested in discussing what gaps we have the technology and what
> possible solutions we might need to do.
>
> Jari
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email