Re: [Autoconf] new charter

HyungJin Lim <dream.hjlim@gmail.com> Fri, 27 February 2009 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dream.hjlim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F92B3A6966 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:04:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d2kSuIzkTxoE for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:04:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CF13A67D4 for <Autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:04:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 11so1423081tim.25 for <Autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:04:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1VndKXUEO6krRxZqa+Py51jxmYv5MU6y2z+7GcCQDr4=; b=rHz2FLXExbXbVRIQFPKf8YrCPjZ7lOaqGWwAXirBWles78M7BN+7Db6SZ4BYj9O1NE m4f0WNAoEZIulQBtOQvHTizbEdTjh1GZpQK2jbj96/81lY+OkGoBRlw1znn1E1w8LClm cOQpwweb32kLOnUT614+UwQTngr8LEKdQUNDA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=c4G4wXEjtbfGKJAx03NdLhJDio6h1gLct2K6Wky2Rz2Mt4mjhGF2rLVE0e6dmwzg0V pCAtcboR2g4P1VUUey5byAj5u6WZfDutmFEmEXxAtrLY7wLg5BLn59FvBwapcA6ZqlcX 4zW7sk3jpryex1Wh27Q58njUhPDQjKOnRD1cI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.110.43.18 with SMTP id q18mr3819337tiq.3.1235747098777; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:04:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <49A7FFA4.9000101@gmail.com>
References: <499F0BA7.90501@piuha.net> <1235680887.4585.5.camel@localhost> <7e8d02d40902261737n1c21b136hd575b8afa8702188@mail.gmail.com> <49A7BC80.4000807@gmail.com> <7e8d02d40902270246k687c68d2t717e301041f8aa53@mail.gmail.com> <49A7E7C1.7080300@gmail.com> <7e8d02d40902270604j2536a938je0cb1629627ebbe2@mail.gmail.com> <49A7F84C.7030606@gmail.com> <7e8d02d40902270645n6101f745tfca6d41302afadf8@mail.gmail.com> <49A7FFA4.9000101@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:04:58 +0900
Message-ID: <7e8d02d40902270704o178a97e2m3a84db23708ac4c4@mail.gmail.com>
From: HyungJin Lim <dream.hjlim@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f07c0cdad8880463e7cad0
Cc: Autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] new charter
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:04:38 -0000

2009/2/27 Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>;

>  ------  wifi "adhoc1"  ------  wifi "adhoc2"  -------- Satelite /
> |NEMOMR|---------------|Router|---------------|Gatewway|--------Int'net
>  ------ LL1         LL2 ------ LL3        LL4  --------  TCA     \
>        G1                                 G4
>
>       LL1...4: IPv6 link-local addresses.
>                Self-formed according to rfc2464.
>       G1: address formed by NEMOMR either from RA sent by Router, or
>           by DHCPv6 considering Router is a DHCPRelay and Gateway is
>           a DHCPServer.
>       G4: ?
>       TCA: Topologically-Correct Address, for Gateway.  It can be
>            manually configured on Gateway, or DHCP, or stateless
>            autoconf.
>
> HyungJin Lim a écrit :
>
>> Why should Router have a TCA?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Is the Router fixed one ? I think "no".
>>
>
> Right - Router is not fixed: it can move in a circular area of radius
> 25m. No more than that. Is this sufficient?
>
> Do you assume this router only has a function for packet routing ?
>>
>
> Mostly yes.
>
> I don't think so. This router also should be managed from remote location
>> in any case. In realistic MANET environment, exactly, mesh network, this
>> router can have some roles as host I think.
>>
>
> Ok, Router should be contacted from the Internet.  Then we should find some
> practical way to configure G addresses for Router too. I'm not sure how to
> come up with G addresses for Router, for the above topology.
>
> I'm not sure how to configure G4 on Gateway either.


  If the gateway has one hop distance from the router, and has IPv6
capability,
 then, the router can get TCA from the gateway I think.
This operation is the basic operation.
 Is it right ?

Hyung-Jin, Lim

>
>
> Alex
>
>
> I think we consider MANET-like situation.
>>
>>
>>
>>        For example, RA sent by Gateway, or any other address conf.
>>        mechanisms.
>>        Is it right ?
>>
>>
>>    I'm not sure why the intermediary Router should have any other
>>    address than its link-local addresses.
>>
>>  Please refers to the above my opinion.
>>  Hyung-Jin Lim
>>
>>
>>    Alex
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>