Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 22 July 2010 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691CE3A6805 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.664
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.585, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XKM816hvqxxt for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588DC3A67AF for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [82.239.213.32]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6887940139; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:19:10 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C4899AD.4030808@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:19:09 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
References: <4C2A6BB7.1000900@piuha.net><4C2CFADD.3040909@piuha.net> <4C378C29.2040302@oracle.com> <323812CA-4C8B-4469-AA6C-0D65191F2735@sensinode.com> <CA71B05E-5CE0-45ED-8292-398136640025@gmail.com> <AANLkTikS7QyebdP6jOXDIM-cm2vE87VgSWFAq6d6PL0v@mail.gmail.com><4C46EFC8.6020501@piuha.net> <4C48144D.4040105@gmail.com><E88A7B1C-7E79-4F0D-9E70-098D649953AB@thomasclausen.org> <4C4815B4.6020907@gmail.com> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0344FA4C@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET> <4C485E37.3080808@gmail.com> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0344FAC3@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
In-Reply-To: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0344FAC3@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100722-1, 22/07/2010), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org, Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:19:01 -0000

Le 22/07/2010 17:41, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) a écrit :
> And then those link local addresses are visible beyond their local
> link.

No, my point is not understood.  The link-local addresses are not
visible beyond their local link.

When the MRs in LFN--MR--MR--MR--LFN use their link-local addresses
these are not visible beyond their respective local link.

> For some that is a problem. For others not.

If they were visible - yes, it would have been a problem, but they are not.

> All of which is irrelevant to the matter in the subject line, where
> the decision is long (though longer would have been better) made.
> Re-hashing the last N years debate gets no one anywhere.

How about if during the last N years my message could not get read?

Alex

>