[Autoconf] Comments on an initial starting point?
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 05 March 2009 17:58 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762D328C3FD for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:58:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.815
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.815 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.165, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gYzor+8NpYnz for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884E428C373 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78840E081DD for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:58:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bur91-3-82-239-213-32.fbx.proxad.net [82.239.213.32]) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7688BE080D6 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:58:32 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <49B012C1.4030502@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:58:25 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: autoconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090305-0, 05/03/2009), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: [Autoconf] Comments on an initial starting point?
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:58:11 -0000
Dear AUTOCONFers, I would like to know your oppinion on the initial starting point for a practical addressing architecture: +--------+ | | fe80::1/64 (the LL address-prefix) | Router +-------------- | | 2001:db8::1/64 (the address prefix configured on +--------+ this interface) Teco and myself came up with this picture, thinking it may represent a good starting point for planning a practical IPv6 addressing scheme for ad-hoc networks. I am interested to listen any kind of oppinion on this - is this good? Can this lead to something good? How? Thanks in advance, Alex
- [Autoconf] Comments on an initial starting point? Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Comments on an initial starting po… Teco Boot