Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt

[Thomas Heide Clausen <[e-mail]>]

Dear Alex,

<wg-chair-hat-on>

As has been pointed out to you by Adrian Farrel (RTG AD) on [e-mail] 
, when you raised the exact same issue there, discussions concerning  
the I-D boilerplate and licensing are appropriate on the tlp-interest  
mailing list -- and NOT on WG mailing lists.

I would therefore kindly ask that you move this discussion to the  
appropriate mailing list -- and that you cease discussion on this  
particular matter on [e-mail].

I entered "tlp-interest mailing list" in a well-known web-search  
engine, which as first result returned this URL -- which I believe  
would be a more appropriate venue, should you want to continue  
discussing this:

	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest

Thanks in advance for your kind cooperation on this matter,

Thomas



On Feb 17, 2010, at 15:51 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:

> HEllo AUTOCONFers,
>
> About a non-technical matter of draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model.
>
> Its boilerplate currently says "Code Components extracted from this
> document must include Simplified BSD License...".
>
> I disagree with it for three reasons.  First and foremost I do not  
> want
> Code Components extracted from this document to include that license,
> but another one.  E.g. if linux kernel implements it then GPL is more
> suitable.  Second, if there are no Code Components then it would be
> useless to talk about Code Components.
>
> Also I disagree with it because the implementation experience which  
> has
> been shared on this list often has been about linux, and which is  
> often
> GPL and rarely BSD license.
>
> I also have to say I understand fully that the boilerplate is there  
> from
> the IETF Trust to which I am bound to abide, by the fact that I am
> subscribed to this list.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Alex
> (this is about a series of I-Ds I am following in several WGs)
>
> Le 16/02/2010 20:59, Ryuji Wakikawa a écrit :
>> Dear All,
>>
>> We have concluded the WGLC of
>> draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-01.txt on Dec/23/09, and have a
>> -02 document issued, following up on this.
>>
>> Thanks to all for all the reviews and comments to this document!
>>
>> After Thomas and I (Chairs) carefully reviewed discussions on the
>> mailing list, we do find that there is rough consensus for the
>> current document.
>>
>> There was an individual objection to the description of the use of
>> link-local address, but we did not detect wide support within the
>> working group. This objection will, of course, be reflected in the
>> PROTO write-up that will be sent to the IESG and the ADs, and
>> reflected in the tracker.
>>
>> As a conclusion, we have established rough consensus to the new
>> document.
>>
>> The WG chairs will start preparing the PROTO writeup for forwarding
>> the document.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> WG chairs
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing
>> list [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf