Re: [Autoconf] Next steps?

Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com> Mon, 22 March 2010 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8D428C130 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RouQuzFtw+uO for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com (mail-ew0-f216.google.com [209.85.219.216]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045003A67E1 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so68199ewy.28 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=g6IwWi6LqNJMoDc9isZ4Fs1hsTvzJv6H+cIk6i0Bkyc=; b=LDaRQ5Q+pO0LFIPJoxCR9b9JCC1iRKtLwVF8CTSH8tPUstUPbkR4Q+Ud/wzk8+UZUY tQEKXDVK00WXStHYu0svFfGsMQM/mcfhK5sKjUt/ZWHRX9AW9HLFZWGmAo72xZhckbzL RurOaeBEmsvZ7pxTYrE+uDFOKQmj7+Z4zXlOs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=r8t5QqHnaR39DiR7AfSLnymXsc/6GRyQCTwI/tHNuYsnNvid1o4rQwUodSdjshqq0H eTPZ69WE5QyqKHq7lrAFrhMh/fqpoSiAN+5XDHYQz6kkbyErxUophMyHKT0MjhDv4OEA oHCi/M+wW5pJnnaLdlj4y2J74vNTR6w8a1hkI=
Received: by 10.102.12.21 with SMTP id 21mr6590133mul.3.1269295390007; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-wireless-open-a-40-145.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-wireless-open-a-40-145.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.40.145]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s11sm629453mue.41.2010.03.22.15.03.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25c114b91003221459k63900ba7rf79e3ae26e81dc0a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:03:02 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BDD8EC3A-13B6-416F-AF8B-FDA862551FA0@gmail.com>
References: <1266925311.4036.71.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <4B882EB5.4070605@gmail.com> <4BA7E52C.9050403@piuha.net> <25c114b91003221459k63900ba7rf79e3ae26e81dc0a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: "autoconf@ietf.org" <autoconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Next steps?
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:02:58 -0000

Hi Ulrich,

#although I am sitting next to you, let me answer here.

On 2010/03/22, at 14:59, Ulrich Herberg wrote:

> I agree with Jari on this point. 
> 
> To the chairs: is there already an agenda for the meeting? Will there be solutions presented? 

Yes, we got 5 presentation requests and allocate slots for all the requests.  
We also plan to spend more time on "our next step" at this meeting.

We will publish agenda shortly (sorry for delay).

thanks,
ryuji


> 
> Ulrich
> 
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> Alex,
> 
> 
> In the solution space I am interested in the use of link-local addresses
> and of multicast link-scoped addresses.
> 
> I hope these are not forbidden by the IPv6 addressing architecture
> document, which seems to be sent to the IESG now.
> 
> Actually, I *do* want to see the working group's solutions build on top of the address model that we have just completed. And it does discourage the use of link-local addresses. Lets not return to that discussion, I would be more interested in discussing what gaps we have the technology and what possible solutions we might need to do.
> 
> Jari
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf