Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.

["Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <[e-mail]>]

Charles Perkins
> I'd be happy if it were possible for [autoconf] to
> be allowed to consider the excellent body of work that
> was seen already years ago -- the same body of work
> that motivated me and others to create and spend a lot
> of time over the last years and years.

If Charlie can find a few like-minded people to work on
that, why not add this as a parallel activity? The
rationale of why two cases should be straightforward to
make, they are almost chalk and cheese in e.g. centralised
versus non-centralised. This is actually added safety to
the group producing something, as if one succeeds and the
other fails, that's still good.

Unfortunately, I can't offer to be one of those people.
Although I should be able to contribute at the read and
comment level, more than that is needed. I only didn't
make the suggestion earlier as it needs people (with
all due respect to Charlie, plural) to do the work.

-- 
Christopher Dearlove
Technology Leader, Communications Group
Networks, Security and Information Systems Department
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: [phone]  Fax: [phone]

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************