Re: [Autoconf] new charter

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 27 February 2009 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F303A6847 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:16:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.178
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.178 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j0Zw-uU+wPRN for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DC33A67E4 for <Autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nephilia.intra.cea.fr (nephilia.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.33]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id n1RDF6YU006901; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:15:06 +0100
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by nephilia.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1RDGoo2006210; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:16:50 +0100 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.133.173]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id n1RDGn6H019050; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:16:49 +0100
Message-ID: <49A7E7C1.7080300@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:16:49 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HyungJin Lim <dream.hjlim@gmail.com>
References: <499F0BA7.90501@piuha.net> <7E8A76F7-2CE0-463A-8EE8-8877C46B4715@gmail.com> <49A6D436.7020505@gmail.com> <000001c99845$1dc56190$595024b0$@nl> <49A6F125.40400@gmail.com> <1235680887.4585.5.camel@localhost> <7e8d02d40902261737n1c21b136hd575b8afa8702188@mail.gmail.com> <49A7BC80.4000807@gmail.com> <7e8d02d40902270246k687c68d2t717e301041f8aa53@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7e8d02d40902270246k687c68d2t717e301041f8aa53@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] new charter
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:16:32 -0000

Hi Hyung-Jin,

HyungJin Lim a écrit :
[...]
> Host1 may be a Router I think. This router may be mobile router.i.e,
> NEMO. In disaster environment, this scenario is possible. Then,
> gateway will use satelite channel. Considering your case, Host1 will
> get his address from the upper router (case 1) or the gateway (case
> 2). 

Something along these lines?:

  ------  wifi "adhoc1"  ------  wifi "adhoc2"  -------- Satelite /
|NEMOMR|---------------|Router|---------------|Gatewway|--------Int'net
  ------ LL1         LL2 ------ LL3        LL4  --------          \
         G1                                 G4

        LL1...4: IPv6 link-local addresses.
                 Self-formed according to rfc2464.
        G1: formed by NEMOMR either from RA sent by Router, or by
        DHCPv6 considering Router is a DHCPRelay and Gateway is
        a DHCPServer.
        G4: ?


> According to which case is configured, this network has other
> aspects.

I agree.

Alex

> 
> anyway,
> 
> Already, Teco described satifactory aspects relation to this
> situation in previous message. Do you also agree with his comments ?
> 
> Thanks, Hyung-Jin, Lim
> 
> 
> Alex
> 
>