IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] closing the working group?

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 08 July 2011 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2014121F8A1B for <autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eOUvu5h2svD6 for <autoconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D4D21F86D4 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.2) with ESMTP id p68F3XJS025107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:03:33 +0200
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p68F3X8P007855 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:03:33 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [132.166.133.178] (is010173.intra.cea.fr [132.166.133.178]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id p68F3WuM008701 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:03:33 +0200
Message-ID: <4E171C44.6080704@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:03:32 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: autoconf@ietf.org
References: <4D9180CF.1080008@piuha.net><1FABB0A6-AA51-4099-9980-9229CA27979C@inf-net.nl> <4D9881C5.2040009@gmail.com> <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65C699E7F8B@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65C699E7F8B@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] closing the working group?
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:03:36 -0000

I wonder what is going to happen to this WG?

I understand it does not meet in Quebec?

I am asking because we may write a draft about DHCP and default route 
and I was thinking maybe AUTOCONF was relevant. (draft not ready for 
Quebec, but discussion can be issued any time).

Alex

Le 15/04/2011 18:10, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
> I'm wondering what is going to happen with this working
> group also. We have a number of published documents that
> are somehow related (RFC5214, RFC5320, RFC5558, RFC5720,
> RFC6139, RFC6179, etc.) and other publications that are
> waiting to be lined up with the right wg (seal(bis),
> vet(bis), aero, etc.). Some of these works might also
> be consistent with what others like Teco are trying
> to achieve.
>
> Do we consider our work here as done?
>
> Thanks - Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email