Re: [Autoconf] Next steps?

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Tue, 23 February 2010 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D529628C28D for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:00:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id srDP0yaQ2zfB for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (mail-bw0-f211.google.com [209.85.218.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BF728C1B8 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2604497bwz.29 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:02:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.8.75 with SMTP id g11mr2018733bkg.172.1266930157439; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:02:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phoenix-mac.local (sphinx.lix.polytechnique.fr [129.104.11.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm1826050bwz.2.2010.02.23.05.02.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B83D1E8.5000003@herberg.name>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:02:32 +0100
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: autoconf@ietf.org
References: <1266925311.4036.71.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <1266925311.4036.71.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Next steps?
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:00:40 -0000

Hi,

wouldn't we need to recharter first before working on solutions?

The charter says:
" The main purpose of the AUTOCONF WG is to describe the addressing
model for ad hoc networks [...]. Once this sole work item is completed,
the group can be rechartered to work on additional issues."


Ulrich


On 2/23/10 12:41 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 	It seems that after a very long (and not free of pain sometimes)
> process, the WG seems to be close to be done with its currently only one
> milestone.
>
> 	I guess we now should start working on solution-space, right? If that
> is finally the step to go, I'd like to know if the WG thinks that it'd
> make sense / be useful to update some of the documents we submitted in
> the past about solution space:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-solution-space-02 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-evaluation-considerations-03
>
> and 
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-manet-autoconf-survey-04
>
> I think these documents can help in the solution space discussion. If
> people are interested, we can update it taking into account the current
> direction of the WG and the addressing-model doc, so they can be used in
> the (hopefully) upcoming discussions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos
>
>   
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>