IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt

Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com> Tue, 16 February 2010 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D06628C15E for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:01:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AUsCw5qelaiJ for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE0C28C137 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:01:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so455203qwb.31 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:03:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=/U1W0DLvFp8gIdknV8PpPblQZCiXmHRn/czsctSIRyU=; b=AyVuFDC4VkiSpMoktZq6jepxIxzSW3zMQR4jQVqeh/3nz5wQS2Amg0mttgE0AyPPsU xlFcLxLgVN5gfeqH0nL4QtdL7WesrFsswQUJ9cpsXeVlXf8w10KU1aoXMMgRNgYAQ+Yn iuQd9BudXUpDWjd0d/z7uNIHb9OYdebzUW2ks=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=B9EojcsiXLkBb4k+29qDZLMbEtYgDthKUsf9PF3PsWtHRpmUUhUHhwlFCfiYB2TNca Tv9VcwbT9AHZk7o0Lx0JBCJMvgsmHYUR/wjwN7sWmekD0u0hQj6RpNmWBFcQvNYGYjp2 kSPScXH/J6zIiYEvF8QUtZT9b2wsIR9v7D8I8=
Received: by 10.224.123.196 with SMTP id q4mr1125280qar.117.1266350595828; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.18.110? (adsl-99-49-9-50.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [99.49.9.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm22894228qwk.0.2010.02.16.12.03.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:03:14 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B7AF98B.7050806@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:03:10 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C81DE27A-DB50-489E-8297-5949D2E11683@gmail.com>
References: <6565C346-EBE5-425A-9291-BBCA4A9FCE27@gmail.com> <4B7AF98B.7050806@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:01:46 -0000

We will send you the PROTO document shortly.

thanks for waiting!
ryuji

On 2010/02/16, at 12:01, Jari Arkko wrote:

> Great. Lets move this doc forward!
> 
> Jari
> 
> Ryuji Wakikawa kirjoitti:
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> We have concluded the WGLC of
>> draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-01.txt on Dec/23/09, and have a -02
>> document issued, following up on this.
>> 
>> Thanks to all for all the reviews and comments to this document!
>> 
>> After Thomas and I (Chairs) carefully reviewed discussions on the
>> mailing list, we do find that there is rough consensus for the current
>> document.
>> 
>> There was an individual objection to the description of the use of
>> link-local address, but we did not detect wide support within the
>> working group. This objection will, of course, be reflected in the PROTO
>> write-up that will be sent to the IESG and the ADs, and reflected in the
>> tracker.
>> 
>> As a conclusion, we have established rough consensus to the new document.
>> 
>> The WG chairs will start preparing the PROTO writeup for forwarding the
>> document.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> WG chairs
>> 
>> 
>>  
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email