Re: [Autoconf] Updated ad hoc addressing model document

["Charles E. Perkins" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Fred,

On 1/29/2010 10:10 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>
> I believe OSPFv3 for one is going to need link-locals
> when it is used as a MANET routing protocol. (That is
> not to say that OSPFv3 can only carry IPv6 routes; it
> can also use Address Family extensions to carry IPv4
> routes.)
>    

I'd like to see how they are going to do it.

For all the discussion about how some people really
really need link-locals, I somehow missed the part
about how they were really going to be able to do
it -- except under highly restrictive circumstances
(e.g., single hop from backbone, ...).  But, full disclosure
here, I didn't follow the OSPF effort very well.  At one
point, when I was paying attention, it seemed to me that
they were trying to do the right thing.

Regards,
Charlie P.